Switchblade turbocharger

its not my thread or my potential customers asking for it either...

funny, we dont see one of these on YOUR truck?
 
TURBOLVR said:
its not my thread or my potential customers asking for it either...
Click to expand...



We have posted multiple data references on the efficiencies of this turbo.


You are correct, it's not your thread or your potential customers so if you don't have anything intelligent to add to the conversation I suggest you GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :ft::ft:
 
Gwoody said:
You are correct, it's not your thread or your potential customers so if you don't have anything intelligent to add to the conversation I suggest you GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :ft::ft:
Click to expand...

:clap: You guys must have GREAT customer service too!
I guess asking the usual intelligent questions doesnt qualify here? I have the money to burn to try one, but the general attitude of those that represent this turbo make me want to spend it elsewhere.
 
TURBOLVR said:
:clap: You guys must have GREAT customer service too!
I guess asking the usual intelligent questions doesnt qualify here? I have the money to burn to try one, but the general attitude of those that represent this turbo make me want to spend it elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Can't be any worse than yours since you have been asked for a longer period of time for data on your turd rammer, or tunnel rammer and you have provided less data. I even believe you were asked what data would convince you, and you didn't have much to say.
 
The thing I have the hardest time with is 80psi from a s300 compressor and the much smaller drive numbers. Anything is possible but when something is far enough out of the range of normal anyone with any sense should question it a little.
 
DirtyMaxx03 said:
No, he isn't a paying vendor. So nobody should care about his numbers. He's not publicly selling his ****. If he did have a thread pimping his ****, I'd be asking for some proof just like I am here. One guys bull**** logs and pre-k graph aren't enough. Why anyone would have spent 3k for a mystery turbo is beyond me. I'll stick with my cheap ass BW's.
Click to expand...

So turbolvr isn't trying to sell sh!t to the public. Wonder who's website this is then?? Crazy Carl's
 If he wants proof for an actual paying vendors product he needs to start proving his stuff.
 
TheBigNasty said:
I wanna see a video of 40 drive vs 80 boosht!
Click to expand...

Joesixpack said:
THIS! And a dyno sheet showing 1000hp+ on this mythical ratio.
Click to expand...

NickTF said:
The thing I have the hardest time with is 80psi from a s300 compressor and the much smaller drive numbers. Anything is possible but when something is far enough out of the range of normal anyone with any sense should question it a little.
Click to expand...

waste of time asking it will never happen. they obviously have no way or intension to show anything and are now trying to ignore the subject and push the conversation to sh*tt*ng on me. :stab:
 
TURBOLVR said:
waste of time asking it will never happen. they obviously have no way or intension to show anything and are now trying to ignore the subject and push the conversation to sh*tt*ng on me. :stab:
Click to expand...

Actually sense your intelligence is limited. A few things you can't comprehend. You seem to forget there were numerous other logs that showed boost and drive numbers. More importantly you were asked to leave. Lol
 
I've read most of Carl's threads and I've never seen him claim any unbelievable numbers. On this thread we saw claims of 2:1 boost/drive #'s and then nothing for 6 months to back that up. There is absolutely no way that truck is seeing 80 psi boost with those mods.

Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
 
chevota84 said:
I've read most of Carl's threads and I've never seen him claim any unbelievable numbers. On this thread we saw claims of 2:1 boost/drive #'s and then nothing for 6 months to back that up. There is absolutely no way that truck is seeing 80 psi boost with those mods.

Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

As in any engineering you can throw out the outlying data points, if you do, you end up with lots of boost greater than drive data. Look at the other logs, logs from completely seperate trucks.

The numbers that carl does claim. Have you ever seen an ounce of data to back them up?
 
I've read most of Carl's threads and I've never seen him claim any unbelievable numbers. On this thread we saw claims of 2:1 boost/drive #'s and then nothing for 6 months to back that up. There is absolutely no way that truck is seeing 80 psi boost with those mods.<br />
<br />
Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
<br />
<br />
As in any engineering you can throw out the outlying data points, if you do, you end up with lots of boost greater than drive data. Look at the other logs, logs from completely seperate trucks.<br />
<br />
The numbers that carl does claim. Have you ever seen an ounce of data to back them up?
Click to expand...
The other logs seem a lot more believable to me, but the op is saying that an analog gauge is backing up the data logger readings for boost. If that's true, then you'd have to throw out the drive and vane position logs to make those #'s. I just can't see any way that he's going to make 86 psi boost with an 18cm housing and 70hp injectors. If the vane position was closed it'd make more sense but the drive #'s would be crazy high.



Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top