Advertisement |
|
|
|
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
|
6.0 Powerstroke Discussion of the 03-06 6.0 |
05-14-2016, 10:51 AM
|
#1
|
Name: steed
Title: Green Behind the Ears
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2012
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 81
|
6.4 compounds on a 6.0?
What's your guys thoughts using the 6.4 compounds on a 6.0 or other motor?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=074PO6nsg6Y
Last edited by steed; 05-14-2016 at 10:52 AM.
|
|
|
05-16-2016, 11:31 AM
|
#2
|
Name: sootie
Title: .....like a BAWSS
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2013
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 866
|
its been done before... check out powerstroke army there is a thread.
|
|
|
05-16-2016, 11:49 AM
|
#3
|
Name: Bustedknuckles
Title: Honey Badger
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,778
|
WHS ^ It was a fail in my opinion even though he got it working properly
__________________
2004 Lb7: 06 front clip, Idaho-Rob tunes , PPE trans, ML converter, Airdog, ARP head studs, s366.
|
|
|
05-16-2016, 11:51 AM
|
#4
|
Name: DirtyMaxx03
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,862
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bustedknuckles
WHS ^ It was a fail in my opinion even though he got it working properly
|
Agree'd. Just because they worked doesnt mean he gained anything.
__________________
Sean
Stock 2005 LLY
|
|
|
05-18-2016, 07:24 PM
|
#5
|
Name: shmoo
Title: Rookie
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 21
|
He's actually still working on them. Last I talked to him he was still making some progress
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
05-18-2016, 08:30 PM
|
#6
|
Name: cmont58
Title: Yankee
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Corryton, TN
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,071
|
It's a cool idea and I'm sure he has a lot of time and effort into it but I just don't see the benefit in having that setup.
__________________
05 6.0 F250 eclb, studded, deleted, Warren 205/100s, T4 up pipes, s366, tuned by Innovative.
|
|
|
05-19-2016, 10:13 AM
|
#7
|
Name: Scooter's Roofing
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 17,007
|
If they were easier to bolt on, I could see it being worth chasing. But the main reason the 6.4 has compounds is to be able to maintain positive EBP-to-MAP differential so that the EGR can work.
I've considered going the other direction... larger VNT single (66?)
But any benefits are outweighed by the complexity of simplification, so I stick with compounds
__________________
that's pretty much all of it
|
|
|
05-19-2016, 12:55 PM
|
#8
|
Name: crackerman
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,800
|
Why not go with something like an sxe64. Non vnt.
|
|
|
05-20-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#9
|
Name: Scooter's Roofing
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 17,007
|
Modded compounds are cheaper, fit like OEM, and move more air
__________________
that's pretty much all of it
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.
|