duke1n
Banned
Oh man I thought you were going to come back with some air density calculations proving that there was no more than a 6% density loss at any elevation with a turbo?
So why is it then that even the fuel cars when they come up here to Denver drop off substantually and only run comparable times by over driving their chargers and adding more nitro? I would think if anything could be reletively less effected by elevation and air density loss it would be a fuel engine that is moving gobs of air and fuel?
PS you seat of the pants meter is probably skewed by the lack of oxygen to the brain at 6000' lol
So why is it then that even the fuel cars when they come up here to Denver drop off substantually and only run comparable times by over driving their chargers and adding more nitro? I would think if anything could be reletively less effected by elevation and air density loss it would be a fuel engine that is moving gobs of air and fuel?
PS you seat of the pants meter is probably skewed by the lack of oxygen to the brain at 6000' lol
Last edited: