Advertisement |
|
|
|
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
|
03-06-2017, 10:28 AM
|
#1
|
Name: TTR 21
Title: Human Spear
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Jordan, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,158
|
ATS Gauntlet Challenge!
Randy Reyes was finally able to break the 2k mark on ATS's in house dyno!
__________________
Budget Beater: 9.36 @ 148 MPH
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 10:43 AM
|
#2
|
Name: 97crewcab
Title: Wrong.
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,804
|
That was fuel only or spray? I thought I heard on fuel.
That is impressive.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 11:01 AM
|
#3
|
Name: TTR 21
Title: Human Spear
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Jordan, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97crewcab
That was fuel only or spray? I thought I heard on fuel.
That is impressive.
|
1885 I believe on fuel only and 2121 with spray.
__________________
Budget Beater: 9.36 @ 148 MPH
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 11:30 AM
|
#4
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Holy **** on that correction factor Batman! That would put him running faster than Lavon Miller in the quarter mile at a curb weight of 7,200 pounds
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 11:31 AM
|
#5
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Even if his truck weighed 8000 pounds he would still be in the 8s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 12:00 PM
|
#6
|
Name: Nootch
Title: nosprkreqrd
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ft. Mcmurray
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,359
|
1.246841cf
__________________
Clever.Wise.Mechanic.
Spark plugs are for those who can't handle the pressure
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 12:00 PM
|
#7
|
Name: TTR 21
Title: Human Spear
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Jordan, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,158
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justappumped24v
Even if his truck weighed 8000 pounds he would still be in the 8s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
|
Thats what Randy wanted so that's what we are shooting for! UCC will tell its tail.
__________________
Budget Beater: 9.36 @ 148 MPH
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 12:08 PM
|
#8
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Well I really hope he reaches his goal because that would truly be a wicked sight to watch his dually go in the 8s best of luck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 12:12 PM
|
#9
|
Name: TTR 21
Title: Human Spear
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Jordan, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,158
|
Last years UCC he went 9.62 @ 150mph weighing 7650lbs with an engine that made 200-300hp less than this new one does.
__________________
Budget Beater: 9.36 @ 148 MPH
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 02:16 PM
|
#10
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
If you use those numbers his old motor made 1400ish hp so if the new one makes 300 more he should run 9.0 according to the comp d calculator. His et is matching the uncorrected number
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 02:44 PM
|
#11
|
Name: JQmile
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,976
|
E.T. Calculators don't work right when you're trying to move 7-8K off the line. There's no possible way you're going to get a 1.2-1.3 60ft like a drag car at that type of weight.
__________________
89 Dodge 972rwhp on the hose, still a VE!
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 02:54 PM
|
#12
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JQmile
E.T. Calculators don't work right when you're trying to move 7-8K off the line. There's no possible way you're going to get a 1.2-1.3 60ft like a drag car at that type of weight.
|
In my experience my uncorrected dyno number falls with 4% of my et on multiple trucks at multiple tracks. I'm a firm believer in ET hp, as that's truly a test of power. Too many unsubstantiated calculations on a dyno. I also don't think forced induction engines should use a correction factor. That is my opinion though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#13
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JQmile
E.T. Calculators don't work right when you're trying to move 7-8K off the line. There's no possible way you're going to get a 1.2-1.3 60ft like a drag car at that type of weight.
|
IMG_4095.JPG
That's a 861hp uncorrected 60ft at 8080lbs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 03:00 PM
|
#14
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Not to mention that's street tires and a light launch
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 10:01 PM
|
#15
|
Name: 2007 5.9
Title: West Coast Dyno Modifier
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NorCal
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,927
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justappumped24v
I also don't think forced induction engines should use a correction factor. That is my opinion though.
|
In this case wouldn't it be a double correction factor?
Artificial atmosphere from the turbos, and more artificial air from a bottle?
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 10:05 PM
|
#16
|
Name: Justappumped24v
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Illinois
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2007 5.9
In this case wouldn't it be a double correction factor?
Artificial atmosphere from the turbos, and more artificial air from a bottle?
|
I like where your heads at!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
05 QCSB24v HTD 6.8L, DDP fueling PDD shifted
2011 MCSB 6.7, built 68rfe
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 12:52 AM
|
#17
|
Name: Big Blue24
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedar City, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,310
|
As the owner and operator of a Mustang Dyno at altitude, 1701 raw is a BIG number on the ole Mustang dream destroyer!!! We've had fewer than 5 trucks ever break 1,000 HP uncorrected on our Mustang and we've ran several "1,000HP" trucks that never surpassed 700 raw....
My best pull ever with the Junker on our Mustang MD-1750 is like 821 raw and it's no slouch, I'll bet Randy's Red Delicious is a rocket!!!
Can't wait for UCC this year, definitely won't have a monster correction factor there in Indiana, but it'll be fun to compare 5,700' raw and corrected Mustang numbers to low altitude Superflow raw and corrected numbers.
__________________
95' 2wd Junker Drag Truck
1502 HP Fuel-Only 12mm P7100 Pump
SXE 472 over GTX55 116mm
OEM 12v Block
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 03:59 AM
|
#18
|
Name: BigPapa
Title: Truckless
Status:
Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Springfield, TN
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 5,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Blue24
As the owner and operator of a Mustang Dyno at altitude.....
|
Is your dyno mobile or stationary?
__________________
Scott
2003 Avalanche Z71
Common sense is like deodorant. The people that need it most never use it.
|
|
|
03-07-2017, 11:34 PM
|
#19
|
Name: Big Blue24
Title: Comp Diesel Sponsor
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cedar City, UT
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 6,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapa
Is your dyno mobile or stationary?
|
Stationary built-into the shop floor, big 50" rollers!!! But we allow CompD guys, BIG HP Guys, or cool stuff to run for free!
All I know is I left for Texas with a 780 HP tuneup and it ran several high 10's at 129 to 130 MPH at 5325 lbs race weight. I'm not sure how much if any power it picks up going from 5700' to 100' Ennis Texas, but it does pick up about 8 to 10 psi boost.
__________________
95' 2wd Junker Drag Truck
1502 HP Fuel-Only 12mm P7100 Pump
SXE 472 over GTX55 116mm
OEM 12v Block
|
|
|
03-08-2017, 05:38 AM
|
#20
|
Name: BigPapa
Title: Truckless
Status:
Here
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Springfield, TN
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 5,009
|
I was asking because I have suggested before, that if someone with a mobile dyno would get a strong truck to make a few runs at a low elevation, then drive to a high elevation and do the same thing, we could put this whole correction factor/elevation issue to bed.
__________________
Scott
2003 Avalanche Z71
Common sense is like deodorant. The people that need it most never use it.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.
|