Advertisement
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Home Who's Online Today's Posts HP Calculator CompD Gift Shop Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Competition Diesel.Com - Bringing The BEST Together > The Entrance Gate- Welcome to Competition Diesel > Competition Events and Get-Togethers > Full Pull Productions
Register Members List Timeslips EFI Live Library Invite Your Friends FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2012, 07:54 AM   #41
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGuy24 View Post
Yup - out of air at 600hp on stock chargers
Yeah but with some elite parts they still appear stock and will support 700 ....some more

from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 08:45 AM   #42
FordGuy24
 
FordGuy24's Avatar

Name: FordGuy24
Title: Josh Mink
Status: Not Here
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plain City,OH
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClamDigger4 View Post
Yeah but with some elite parts they still appear stock and will support 700 ....some more

from phone
and so can the dmax guys....Stock apearing ftw
__________________
10' Ford 6.4 CC/SB

CAMB Motorsports
Toops Performance
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:36 AM   #43
nwpadmax
 
nwpadmax's Avatar

Name: nwpadmax
Title: Turbo Geek
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the shop
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04jimc View Post
Why the bumper rule? Keeps a lot of guys away. This class is geared towards daily driven diesels, many guys have the " Ranch Hand" bumpers cuz of the deer they have hit, not to stack weight in there. How hard is it to look for weight behind them?
What? What kind of BS is this?

You really want the guy next to you running 200# on the nose and you're not? Because that's exactly what will happen.

The bumper on your truck probably has nothing to do with it
__________________
"What I said does equate too what can happen....Alote."
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:43 AM   #44
nwpadmax
 
nwpadmax's Avatar

Name: nwpadmax
Title: Turbo Geek
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the shop
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,128
What's the point of the "stock-appearing" discussion when that is not what the posted rules state? Y'all read?

Gotta love WS!
__________________
"What I said does equate too what can happen....Alote."
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:45 AM   #45
FordGuy24
 
FordGuy24's Avatar

Name: FordGuy24
Title: Josh Mink
Status: Not Here
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plain City,OH
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 2,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
What's the point of the "stock-appearing" discussion when that is not what the posted rules state? Y'all read?

Gotta love WS!
You always a douche?

Cary on, my derail was just to what had been posted in regards to the 6.4.
__________________
10' Ford 6.4 CC/SB

CAMB Motorsports
Toops Performance
 
Old 10-15-2012, 09:58 AM   #46
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Turbocharger:
The turbocharger is limited to a stock-appearing, OEM/Factory make-specific charger only. Internal modification of the OEM/Factory charger may result in disqualification.


What does that say


from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 10:04 AM   #47
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClamDigger4 View Post
Turbocharger:
The turbocharger is limited to a stock-appearing, OEM/Factory make-specific charger only. Internal modification of the OEM/Factory charger may result in disqualification.


What does that say


from phone

Internal modifications may result in qualifications. I do think they should remove the may.
__________________
2008 4x4 Megacab, 68RFE
97 Dodge gone....
24V P-Pump Mafia member #1(retired)

Thanks to Mumau Diesel, Goerend Transmission, Northeast Diesel Service!
 
Old 10-15-2012, 10:13 AM   #48
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Very true. It's those words that make the interpretation of the rules different for everyone.

from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 10:28 AM   #49
05_LLY
 
05_LLY's Avatar

Name: 05_LLY
Title: Hi Im earth, have we met?
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mount Pleasant, PA
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by DISTURBED View Post
Rick you will be ready to ax this class before the first hook. Stock appearing is kinda a joke with people building cheater chargers like what these guys are talking about. You would be alot better off and retain your hair with a smooth bore 2.5 with no bushing/step cover rule
THis i agree with^^^, WS truck will require turbo checking at every pull IMO, just the way it is, that could prove to be diffacult to, seeing how 2.6 had the chargers checked 3 times this year some illegels slipped through, some were even measured at the wrong location!......

turbos should be checked every pull, if you arent there in time to be teched...sorry about your luck...go home. JMO!

Big bumpers......who cares!


Seeing as how the hitcth rule is the same as 2.6, i guess that means draw bar hitches will be allowed in WS to......
__________________
Girls Night Out Pulling
Blackout Performance

Last edited by 05_LLY; 10-15-2012 at 10:41 AM.
 
Old 10-15-2012, 11:54 AM   #50
nwpadmax
 
nwpadmax's Avatar

Name: nwpadmax
Title: Turbo Geek
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the shop
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordGuy24 View Post
You always a douche?
No, but I can read

Apparently some of you guys can't put two sentences together in your minds at the same time.

The derail was fine, but the way the rule is written above, the only thing legal are bone stock chargers, and there is nothing to be interpreted.

If y'all want something different than that, come to the rules meeting.
__________________
"What I said does equate too what can happen....Alote."
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:02 PM   #51
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
No, but I can read

Apparently some of you guys can't put two sentences together in your minds at the same time.

The derail was fine, but the way the rule is written above, the only thing legal are bone stock chargers, and there is nothing to be interpreted.

If y'all want something different than that, come to the rules meeting.
The point is people using the cheetah style Turbo and getting away with it.

from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:28 PM   #52
nwpadmax
 
nwpadmax's Avatar

Name: nwpadmax
Title: Turbo Geek
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the shop
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClamDigger4 View Post
The point is people using the cheetah style Turbo and getting away with it.
Agreed, but those would be internal mods, would they not...and DQ'd.


For the sake of everyone's sanity, 2.5" smooth bore is the way to go and dispense with techs trying to figure out if wheel A is different than wheel B and if either is different from stock on about what...a dozen different brands/models? I'm not seeing where that would be good for anything except a hell of a lot of frustration.

That being said, if they allow 2.5 smoothbore, the expensive modded turbos will win, and down the death spiral we go again, pretty soon they'll want hood stacks and weight boxes and big rear ends too.

Bone stock turbos would put the Fords and GM about neck in neck, with the Dodge behind a step. So even that doesn't get everything level, really.
__________________
"What I said does equate too what can happen....Alote."
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:34 PM   #53
TrailerproPop
 
TrailerproPop's Avatar

Name: TrailerproPop
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
Agreed, but those would be internal mods, would they not...and DQ'd.


For the sake of everyone's sanity, 2.5" smooth bore is the way to go and dispense with techs trying to figure out if wheel A is different than wheel B and if either is different from stock on about what...a dozen different brands/models? I'm not seeing where that would be good for anything except a hell of a lot of frustration.



YEP!!
__________________
04 Chevrolet ccsb, lly, EFI, SC IV,
One of the most active Senior Citizen
Sled Pullers around.
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:40 PM   #54
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
Agreed, but those would be internal mods, would they not...and DQ'd.


For the sake of everyone's sanity, 2.5" smooth bore is the way to go and dispense with techs trying to figure out if wheel A is different than wheel B and if either is different from stock on about what...a dozen different brands/models? I'm not seeing where that would be good for anything except a hell of a lot of frustration.

That being said, if they allow 2.5 smoothbore, the expensive modded turbos will win, and down the death spiral we go again, pretty soon they'll want hood stacks and weight boxes and big rear ends too.

Bone stock turbos would put the Fords and GM about neck in neck, with the Dodge behind a step. So even that doesn't get everything level, really.

I don't think the death of a class is spending big money on good parts once. Spending big money on parts($1300 axles, $400 ring and pinions) multiple times per season is an issue.

That being said, it seems this year has been a year for some trucks to be sold though.
__________________
2008 4x4 Megacab, 68RFE
97 Dodge gone....
24V P-Pump Mafia member #1(retired)

Thanks to Mumau Diesel, Goerend Transmission, Northeast Diesel Service!
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:42 PM   #55
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
Agreed, but those would be internal mods, would they not...and DQ'd.


For the sake of everyone's sanity, 2.5" smooth bore is the way to go and dispense with techs trying to figure out if wheel A is different than wheel B and if either is different from stock on about what...a dozen different brands/models? I'm not seeing where that would be good for anything except a hell of a lot of frustration.

That being said, if they allow 2.5 smoothbore, the expensive modded turbos will win, and down the death spiral we go again, pretty soon they'll want hood stacks and weight boxes and big rear ends too.

Bone stock turbos would put the Fords and GM about neck in neck, with the Dodge behind a step. So even that doesn't get everything level, really.
Yeah we are on the same page there.

It would be nice to have everyone run a box charger with a cast wheel. I feel that would help but I'm sure everyone would cry about it. I like the idea of people really having to put a lot of time into tuning and chassis set up to to win. Not just dump a bunch of money into a charger.

A lot of guys is the street class last year were running stuff that wouldn't pass 2.6 rules.
from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:44 PM   #56
ClamDigger4
 
ClamDigger4's Avatar

Name: ClamDigger4
Title: Too Much Time
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Feb 2010
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwpadmax View Post
Agreed, but those would be internal mods, would they not...and DQ'd.
Like Dan pointed out they "MAY" be dq'd


from phone
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:45 PM   #57
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClamDigger4 View Post
Yeah we are on the same page there.

It would be nice to have everyone run a box charger with a cast wheel. I feel that would help but I'm sure everyone would cry about it. I like the idea of people really having to put a lot of time into tuning and chassis set up to to win. Not just dump a bunch of money into a charger.

A lot of guys is the street class last year were running stuff that wouldn't pass 2.6 rules.
from phone

If they don't put money in the turbo, they will put it into the cam, the dyno, changing tires around, etc, etc. Look into the trashiest gas truck pulling there is. If someone has money and wants to put it into it, you can try to write laws(oops I mean rules) to regulate(I mean prevent) folks from doing things.

Starting to seem like this is government, with all the regulations, etc.
__________________
2008 4x4 Megacab, 68RFE
97 Dodge gone....
24V P-Pump Mafia member #1(retired)

Thanks to Mumau Diesel, Goerend Transmission, Northeast Diesel Service!
 
Old 10-15-2012, 12:49 PM   #58
zstroken
 
zstroken's Avatar

Name: zstroken
Title: For $$$ your name here
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Western Michigan(by the lake)
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 23,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClamDigger4 View Post
Like Dan pointed out they "MAY" be dq'd


from phone

The "may" needs to be gone. That is too much of a gray area, either your DQ'd or your not for internal mods.

Me personally think a 2.5 bore is the way to go(not sure on the slick face if this is the lower level class). Definitely no clipped wheels in this class. The protrusion in the 2.6 class was a good compromise to pull HP back. Folks just found it lol.
__________________
2008 4x4 Megacab, 68RFE
97 Dodge gone....
24V P-Pump Mafia member #1(retired)

Thanks to Mumau Diesel, Goerend Transmission, Northeast Diesel Service!
 
Old 10-15-2012, 01:53 PM   #59
nwpadmax
 
nwpadmax's Avatar

Name: nwpadmax
Title: Turbo Geek
Status: Not Here
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Out in the shop
Member`s Gallery
Posts: 3,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by zstroken View Post
The "may" needs to be gone. That is too much of a gray area, either your DQ'd or your not for internal mods.

Me personally think a 2.5 bore is the way to go(not sure on the slick face if this is the lower level class). Definitely no clipped wheels in this class. The protrusion in the 2.6 class was a good compromise to pull HP back. Folks just found it lol.

And this we will never agree on. Protrusion was a half-measure that just wasted everyone's time and money to eventually get back to about the same point a year later. That meets my definition of "stupid".

But I still love you anyways Dan

OK, just to say something about WS, replace "may" with "will".
__________________
"What I said does equate too what can happen....Alote."
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.

 


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024, CompetitionDiesel.com
all information found on this site is property of www.competitiondiesel.com