Sledpuller
Comp Diesel Sponsor
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2006
- Messages
- 8,160
May as well start now, discuss amongst yourselves how you would like the 2.6 turbo rule to read for 2010.
2.6 inducer bore plain and simple. Pullers choice on how to get there. And for the people that say oh there will be 4x4 turbos bushed to 2.6, SO WHAT. like its going to work anyway. Plus you can tell if its bigger than a s400 visually. Most any s400, gt42, k31 are all roughly the same physical size. I dont think any bigger turbo bushed down would perform anyway. Tim
You are still limiting the air to the turbo. If you have a 4 in compressor wheel, how big is the turbin wheel going to be? 90 percent of the trucks out there will have a hard time running the 88/96 turbin wheel with the 75 compressor wheel that the big s400's have much less anything bigger. If they think they can spool and stay ontop of it, i say go for it. Techin turbos is pretty much a lost cause so screw it. As long as it has a bushing, stepped cover, contoured wheel, magic pixie dust that measuers 2.6, let it go.
Take the turbo builders out of the equation. Make it a spec type turbo only. You can but an off the shelf S400 for a reasonable price and still make good power.
It has been proven on a dyno that a bushed charger makes more HP than the same native charger. If you want to run a bushed charger step up to the 2.8.
They have plenty exhaust housings available for any application. LOL I'm building a Cummins so I'm not fighting for anyone any more.
you and i both know dyno # dont equal on track performance.
is a bushed charger making 10%, 20% more power then a native charger?
are bushed chargers consistently putting feet on a native charger?
theroretily i can see how a bushed charger could out flow a native charger.
is there any one that is consistantly putting feet on every one else to warrant change/strickter rules?
i too like the top X tuck getting tech in each class rule.
check weight, hitch, hook to sled