286050 or 286110 mahle pistons.

FIRST GEN. JAKE · Aug 1, 2012

Wanting 286050 perferably due to bigger bowl and lower ring land but might end up going with 286110. Let me know what ya got.

Smokem · Aug 1, 2012

Both have a 64mm bowl opening and 14mm TRL.

BlakeW · Aug 1, 2012

PM Sent.

FIRST GEN. JAKE · Aug 1, 2012

Smokem doesn't the 286050 have a larger cc bowl than the 286110? Like 52 or 53 cc vs. 47cc?

Smokem · Aug 2, 2012

286050 52.3cc - 286110 47.1cc

FIRST GEN. JAKE · Aug 2, 2012

smokem would i really gain anything from the 52.3cc bowl since the opening of the bowl is same mm as the 47.1cc bowl?

BBD Performance · Aug 6, 2012

pm for you

Smokem · Aug 6, 2012

FIRST GEN. JAKE said:
smokem would i really gain anything from the 52.3cc bowl since the opening of the bowl is same mm as the 47.1cc bowl?

Loss in compression, and the "lip" area is less likely to deform under high heat on the 286110.

FIRST GEN. JAKE · Aug 6, 2012

Smokem said:
Loss in compression, and the "lip" area is less likely to deform under high heat on the 286110.

thanks for info didnt think about the lip area. i think im going with the 286110 anyways