Mustang dyno

[Dumb Ass Wade]

Anyone like these?, or made good HP with them on a diesel? seems everyone around here is pushing for the dyno jet, why? Whats the diff. Thanks

 

[9712valve]

the dyno jet 284c is bigger, has heavier drum if im not mistaken and that puts a better load on our trucks as to where a mustang dyno has a much smaller drum weighing less, not putting a load a heavy diesel truck as well, if that makes any sense. im not 100% on this but thats probably close to why everyone prefers the dyno jet.

 

[Timebomb]

Most Mustang's have eddy current loaded drums, and will do a nice job of loading your truck. A friend dynoed on both with a fuel only 12v 808hp on the Mustang and 793hp on a 248C, Id say that's close enough considering air temp could have had that effect on the hp.

 

[SMOKIN-U]

i dont know the technical differences between the two but i've personally witnessed doing 544 on a mustang dyno not changing a thing and putting down 652 on a dyno jet

 

[BIGRPOWR]

Anyone like these?, or made good HP with them on a diesel? seems everyone around here is pushing for the dyno jet, why? Whats the diff. Thanks

ur an idiot.

 

[RILES]

welcome back shiny tiger

 

[GRotman]

That right there is why I love this place.

 

[BIGRPOWR]

welcome back shiny tiger

ronnie james dio !!

 

[lukesdiesel]

hehehe

 

[morkable]

Is that NGM wade?

 

[TMONEYDIESEL]

yep

 

[bh10]

ur an idiot.

:hehe::hehe::hehe:

 

[Six_leaker]

A mustang dyno will usualy throw lower HP #'s up to 30% lower than a dynojet.

On a mustang dyno I had a turbo 4cyl make 330 RWHP next day on a dynojet 363RWHP.