KILLER 'B'
Pro Wrench Turner
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,694
I have a question.. How are these pump shops measuring flow in a pump?
All of my experience has taught me that when you bench a pump, you measure total flow in cubic millimeters/ 1000 cycles or strokes at full rack travel. But most pumps seem to be measured in cubic centimeters. It is that Cubic millimeters is too small of a unit of measure for how much these pumps are flowing? Are all plungers added together?
i.e.: A stock 215 horse VP produces 93 cubic millimeters of fuel per stroke at full horsepower.
93 cubic centimeters x 1000 strokes = 93000 Cubic millimeters
93 cubic millimeters X 6 plungers = 558 cubic millimeters.
558 cubic millimeters X 1000 cycles = 558,000 cubic millimeters
93 cubic millimeters = .093 cubic centimeters
.093 cubic centimeters X 1000 Strokes = 93 cubic centimeters
.093 cubic centimeters X 6 plungers = .558 cubic centimeters
.558 cubic centimeters X 1000 cycles = 558 cubic centimeters
So a stock 215 VP can flow 558 CC at stock horsepower?
Or does it flow 93 CC at full horsepower?
Doesn't see to make any sense to me...
Am I correct on this or a lost cause?
All of my experience has taught me that when you bench a pump, you measure total flow in cubic millimeters/ 1000 cycles or strokes at full rack travel. But most pumps seem to be measured in cubic centimeters. It is that Cubic millimeters is too small of a unit of measure for how much these pumps are flowing? Are all plungers added together?
i.e.: A stock 215 horse VP produces 93 cubic millimeters of fuel per stroke at full horsepower.
93 cubic centimeters x 1000 strokes = 93000 Cubic millimeters
93 cubic millimeters X 6 plungers = 558 cubic millimeters.
558 cubic millimeters X 1000 cycles = 558,000 cubic millimeters
93 cubic millimeters = .093 cubic centimeters
.093 cubic centimeters X 1000 Strokes = 93 cubic centimeters
.093 cubic centimeters X 6 plungers = .558 cubic centimeters
.558 cubic centimeters X 1000 cycles = 558 cubic centimeters
So a stock 215 VP can flow 558 CC at stock horsepower?
Or does it flow 93 CC at full horsepower?
Doesn't see to make any sense to me...
Am I correct on this or a lost cause?