Smokem
Turbler
- Joined
- May 10, 2006
- Messages
- 5,565
But I found how to make big boost at Super low rpm and that was the ticket for me.
Wait, no rev gain?
But I found how to make big boost at Super low rpm and that was the ticket for me.
I do understand taking the torque out, easier on drive train and block structure. But most of us love torque that's why we got into diesel in the first place. Look at what Ryan did with all the torque he was making, went fast with lower hp more torque. Torque gets work done. If we could harness all the torque we can make what would go faster, the higher hp or the higher torque?
Sorry not that i have much to add on the topic other then Airflow is where we can make some of the most advancements!
Build a light engine, race a light flywheel, pull a heavy flywheel.Correct on the airflow. These M-57 BMW engines are four baby valves in a baby cylinder and the head will outflow a 12 valve head at certain lifts.
I wouldn't have a clue on what would ultimately be the fastest. If you run with the theory, the lighter stuff wins in a race.
In pulling, you won't beat the tractor power with a racing engine. You will see at UCC if I can get this thing going. Already planning a shift pattern with really low finals. If I let my engine get even the slightest bit low in rpm's, I'll be done.
I guess as is with everything else, a fine line may exist in this theory when too much is too far.
Hanging for ?
If you want to use CompD as your "Facebook" then keep those posts in the off-topic forums. If this thread is supposed to be a tech thread, which I can't even tell anymore, then there is about 1 page out of 6 that contains potentially useful information.
I'd also caution you on calling out moderators, whether they are green, orange, or red. Mods are here to keep this place in check (see above). Quoting your own posts and making several posts in a row when there is a multi-quote feature only adds confusion and removes clarity from the message you are trying to convey. We can all read here, and read your posts the first time; you don't need to re-quote them to try and get your point across.
Wait, no rev gain?
I have no idea what he's running, but here's a link to a website about the pulling team. Interesting sidenote, the friend he started building the tractor with is my brother-in-laws uncle!On topic for this thread now. What's the bro code on hooking up with your friends ex? That a go or nah?
Seriously though, the local that won the light pro points and qualified for the enderle "says" he's running a 4.3". Somewhere between that and 4.5" seems common.
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk
I know it might make for some difficult rockers, lol, but what if a fella canted the seats and guides just enough to facilitate a little larger intake valve? Looks like lots of meat up in there around the guides on the Warhead.
To kinda get the thread back on track.this is my $0.02.
Like I had mentioned before, you need to do some basics like graph the position/velocity/acceleration of a piston in relation to crank angle for different rod/stroke ratios. That will coincide with the light/heavy rotating mass you explained to us "internet idiots.'
Second, dynamic combustion pressure data. That will be the holy Grail of information if you are going to try and push the limits.
Injection systems, my opinion is ditch the mechanical idea but that is my opinion
I remember that like it was yesterday, he had cut his Holley dominater carbs in the middle and spaced them over the ports. It was on tv for about 3 seconds till he threw his jacket over it.Exactly the class I would point anyone to for justification of my theory. One of my first statements to Craig Liberty was, I want you to imagine a pro stock car that weighs 4500# and has just a tiny bit less RPM range and a whole pile more on the torque. Lol ...no joke.
No doubt the most innovative, competitive class to ever grace my life. I was just remembering this evening, one of my all time favorite Racers/Mentors has always been Bob Glidden. I milked cows when I was in late grade school and Jr. High. One of the main reasons for my wrestling success was my hand strength at that young age. My Dad got us some tickets to the 1986 running of the "Spring Nationals" in Columbus, OH. One of my main goals was to shake Bob Glidden's hand. After standing in line for what seamed like hours, was a man I nearly equaled in height at my young age looking at me with that smoker face and pretty much covered in what I would guess now to be clutch dust. I held out my hand and got a real handshake. I knew right then that was one hard working man.
Bob kicked a$$ that day as was the norm back then. After watching Bob on TV come to his senses the day he done a gazillion barrel rolls, he quickly removed his jacket and covered up his intake. Here is a man who's wife is right there, his kids, the TV, it is a lot of drama... and the man has the where-with-all to cover up something that was giving him an edge.
I later done some research and don't care to dig it up now, but, does anyone know the true story behind Bob's lawsuit against Ford?
Because I'm stupid, I've put thought into this. Actually think-tanked it a few years ago over several weeks. Here's the deal, Tobin already touched it, the burn rate of diesel. Audi can afford to have custom diesel made, and they're not using a janky, mechanical, antique platform. Find someone that has real, accurate, in cylinder pressure data, and you'll find your grail. Unfortunately it's not in a Cummins, or something someone short of a multimillionaire can conjure.
Also, 5.9L piston speed is 4720fpm at 6000rpm, since that's been brought back up
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk