ndaniels
New member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 176
My only thought is the fact it doesn't have a sprung hub would make the triple a harder on the trans.
I've run Dans triple in my current tuck for a little while and honestly it shifted faster than the dual disc. Engagement got a little rougher than what I wanted as it broke in, and finally I decided one morning to pull it back out (I tow some).
I replaced it with a steet dual disc from Peter- I've ran those before in my old second gens and they're great for towing and can hold some decent power. If I go any bigger in hp, my only choice for my truck would be the triple tho.
That triple is an awesome clutch and a really impressive piece. If I didn't tow and want better street manners, I'd still have it in the truck. For me and my type of driving the dual disc is perfect.
For you, I think the triple would be a better fit imho. I'm thinking ceramic dual disc should be worse on engagement and clutch life expectancy wouldn't be as good as the triple.
I've run Dans triple in my current tuck for a little while and honestly it shifted faster than the dual disc. Engagement got a little rougher than what I wanted as it broke in, and finally I decided one morning to pull it back out (I tow some).
I replaced it with a steet dual disc from Peter- I've ran those before in my old second gens and they're great for towing and can hold some decent power. If I go any bigger in hp, my only choice for my truck would be the triple tho.
That triple is an awesome clutch and a really impressive piece. If I didn't tow and want better street manners, I'd still have it in the truck. For me and my type of driving the dual disc is perfect.
For you, I think the triple would be a better fit imho. I'm thinking ceramic dual disc should be worse on engagement and clutch life expectancy wouldn't be as good as the triple.