highest hp cr on fuel?

[getblown5.9]

Did hell freeze over...cuz I think Don just took up for Lenny...

 

[Summit]

Did hell freeze over...cuz I think Don just took up for Lenny...

where's the smilie freezing his arse off:hehe:

in the meantime it's :Cheer: and op:

 

[K5KRAZIE]

Did hell freeze over...cuz I think Don just took up for Lenny...

This is what the industry has come to....
$.02 op:

 

[Robertp]

I think Lenny is talking about uncorrected HP here. Ya know, sea level stuff. No inflated, undeserved stuff.

Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black!

 

[lmills]

please elaborate?

 

[c-hawk]

op:

 

[twinmega06]

what was pdi using as a top and bottom turbo?

 

[CREED1]

what was pdi using as a top and bottom turbo?

Big brother with a phat bastard I believe.

 

[Soup Nazi]

The PDI numbers are altitude corrected. Why cant everyone post an uncorrected graph?

Most of us learned the CF game is bogus, but yet some still try and pull that off as legit.

Gimme a break............

 

[McRat]

In cold (thick air) climates, correction factor reduces reported HP.

In thin air, it increases reported HP.

Seems those in cold areas use uncorrected #'s and those in hot climates use corrected.

The true answer would be for someone to come up with a better correction for these trucks. 50% of SAE is close, but nobody would want that.

We ran with the same setup at 2000' DA and 10,000' DA with only tuning changes. ET changed .50 and MPH was down 5mph, IIRC. This is at ~750hp, loss was ~100HP, or about 15%, a 1.15 CF So roughly 2% per 1000' DA.

But a realistic correction factor would make the "cold" trucks dyno lower, and the "hot" trucks dyno lower.

Hence it would be unwanted.