S467

Would have been really badass if I compounded it with something. I've been missing that charger lately.
 
madmikeismad said:
same here. my next setup is going to be 63 over something.
Click to expand...

That's what I want to do as well. I was going to go 64mm though so I can use a s400 frame for durability, however, everyone is making this charger sound like magic... Maybe I should go 2.7mm bigger...
 
I wouldn't say this charger is magic by any means. I may have other issues, but I didn't gain anything over my old SB66, besides wow factor when the hood is open. It does spool well for an S400, and it may be awesome when I figure out my truck's other issue. With a monster VP44, it's not very street friendly. My converter will let it spool fine when unlocked, but in town it is too laggy, even with a .9 housing
 
CorneliusRox said:
That's what I want to do as well. I was going to go 64mm though so I can use a s400 frame for durability, however, everyone is making this charger sound like magic... Maybe I should go 2.7mm bigger...
Click to expand...

They all use the same base wheel. Only difference is the inducer, and the FMW wheel. Literally about 2lbs per minute difference between the 464-468 chagers. The FMW 467 is rated at ~96-97lbs/min and the cast wheeled chargers do ~95lbs/min.
 
Yea, I finally figured that out. This new charger doesn't clean up the smoke anymore than my SB did. I really thought it would help on top end.
 
diesel_importer said:
I wouldn't say this charger is magic by any means. I may have other issues, but I didn't gain anything over my old SB66, besides wow factor when the hood is open. It does spool well for an S400, and it may be awesome when I figure out my truck's other issue. With a monster VP44, it's not very street friendly. My converter will let it spool fine when unlocked, but in town it is too laggy, even with a .9 housing
Click to expand...

Something is wrong imo but idk how the monster VPs act. My brothers was a HUGE improvement over his E.D. 66 and even spooled better. Check for boost leaks.
 
diesel_importer said:
Yea, I finally figured that out. This new charger doesn't clean up the smoke anymore than my SB did. I really thought it would help on top end.
Click to expand...

This is in box charger form keep in mind. There are different 466 options out there that far surpass that 467.7 FMW.
 
murphy41 said:
They all use the same base wheel. Only difference is the inducer, and the FMW wheel. Literally about 2lbs per minute difference between the 464-468 chagers. The FMW 467 is rated at ~96-97lbs/min and the cast wheeled chargers do ~95lbs/min.
Click to expand...

The 464(7-blade 63.5/91.4 cast compressor wheel) I had flows 75lbs/min. The billet wheel(6 blade 63.5/98) I have is an estimated 82-84lbs/min.
 
murphy41 said:
This is in box charger form keep in mind. There are different 466 options out there that far surpass that 467.7 FMW.
Click to expand...



True, but I'm in the same story, my 67 just spanked my 66 till it cried.

Also, I just grossed 23k again today, egt's never broke 1200. I will admit starting off is sluggish but I'm still running a tight converter and highish timing. Next things I do is drop timing back to 19 or so, and 13mm p&b.
 
madmikeismad said:
True, but I'm in the same story, my 67 just spanked my 66 till it cried.

Also, I just grossed 23k again today, egt's never broke 1200. I will admit starting off is sluggish but I'm still running a tight converter and highish timing. Next things I do is drop timing back to 19 or so, and 13mm p&b.
Click to expand...

Were you running a 466 before the 467? Or 366?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top