I know they made little changes between them as for electronics and difference in stl and al and adding clutches , however i haven't had a H output with a E next to eachother, but after going back and fourth over which is better and knowing the designer says they didn't re-engineer, that means they didn't make new inputs/inters/outers and go thru all the engineering tests to make a rating they are applied with, which are the same.Unfortunately, your engineer friend is wrong, the output shaft was redesigned. The RH shafts have a governor assembly swinging and slopping around on them, the RE's have a plain shaft, I can assure you, they are not the same. I also don't believe any OEM would change parts inside a transmission without engineering analysis, testing, re-engineering, and more testing.
So i have to take his word, which is what i believe, otherwise i wouldn't have offered they are the same, however i'll be more then happy to have this discussion with him.Please do, I'll be sure to update the A618 (47rh, 47re, 48re) information on Wikipedia so your buddy has some good reference material :hehe:
Just as when i asked him about concerns with my 68 and that turned into a long discussion of why they only added more clutches to the 1st thru 3rd and took the short cut... I know nothing about the 68rfe transmission, I've never seen one in person, I don't even know how many gears they have.
I'll make sure to ask about this and find out why this is, i have no experience with a broken output, I have seen twist and things can break from many circumstances.
This isn't a pride issue, i just happen to know a engineer and I take his word. Thanks for clearing that up, I don't know many people from New York so I must have mistaken your bold NY-style confidence for pride.
.