S467 Turbo pricing desired

GOT-Torque said:
I wonder how this would spool compared to say a S366/73 .91 T4 charger?
Click to expand...

For me spool was almost exactly the same. Couldn't tell the difference except it pulls a little harder with less boost.

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
 
madmikeismad said:
For me spool was almost exactly the same. Couldn't tell the difference except it pulls a little harder with less boost.

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

so you went from the 366/73 .9 T4 to this charger with no other changes and couldn't tell the difference in spool?

That's awesome, I think the billet 67 flows about 20 lbs/min more than the 366 does.
 
GOT-Torque said:
so you went from the 366/73 .9 T4 to this charger with no other changes and couldn't tell the difference in spool?

That's awesome, I think the billet 67 flows about 20 lbs/min more than the 366 does.
Click to expand...

Correct sir. To my knowledge, the billet wheel didn't flow more than cast, I only got it because I couldn't pass on the deal. The cast wheel/RC is supposed to flow 95lb/min, 15ish more than the 66.

Current list of all turbo performance related stuff at the time of the swap:

Frankentrans w/ Goerend Triple, Billet flexplate, Lee's 5x.016's/Comp DV's, Stainless T4, Billet 67/83/.91 w/ blankets from Levi, 181/210, 4" turbo back, Haisley 5k w/Manley pushrods and springs, 18ish*, Raptor 150, Maxed out 180 pump

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
I didn't have any info on the cast 67, just that the billet 67 flowed >94lbs/min and the 366 flowed 74 lbs/min.

This looks like a decent option for my 6.7...
 
GOT-Torque said:
I didn't have any info on the cast 67, just that the billet 67 flowed >94lbs/min and the 366 flowed 74 lbs/min.

This looks like a decent option for my 6.7...
Click to expand...

I modified my last post as well.

I thought 66 flowed 80/min. So I guess either way it flows more LOL

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
 
Comparing the previous 64mm s300 71 .91 t4 with a spool flange to the present 67mm s400 charger with a spool flange there was near zero difference. This 67 is definitely quick to light!
 
Last edited:
shiftycapone said:
So the new 67 is moving around the same air as a 475?
Click to expand...

Lol on paper yes. Honestly it is hard to say what it is really doing without comparing a 67 and a 75 on the same truck. My gut would say a 475 will make more power especially with a crappy 12v head.

For whatever it is worth a 67 did make 909hp on a common rail truck on an engine dyno according to Jose in a thread on the forced section.
 
NickTF said:
Lol on paper yes. Honestly it is hard to say what it is really doing without comparing a 67 and a 75 on the same truck. My gut would say a 475 will make more power especially with a crappy 12v head.

For whatever it is worth a 67 did make 909hp on a common rail truck on an engine dyno according to Jose in a thread on the forced section.
Click to expand...

Das allotta powa
 
shiftycapone said:
So the new 67 is moving around the same air as a 475?
Click to expand...

That's my understanding. Like 4lb/min less on paper.

One thing I never learned, is when they say it flows XXXlbs/min or cfm, what psi is that usually at, 30psi? Or is psi too inaccurate a way to measure because of different head setups?

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
madmikeismad said:
That's my understanding. Like 4lb/min less on paper.

One thing I never learned, is when they say it flows XXXlbs/min or cfm, what psi is that usually at, 30psi? Or is psi too inaccurate a way to measure because of different head setups?

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

the rated mass flow rate is at a certain point on the compressor map - sommers near the choke line, iirc.

Design and Function of a Turbocharger - Compressor | TurboDriven.com - BorgWarner Turbo Systems
 
BenM said:
I just saw one of these for about $13-1350. I'll try to go through my history and see if I can find where I saw or read that price. I'm looking for one myself. If anyone gets a better deal please post for the rest.

Thanks
Click to expand...

I just saw this thread, but figured I'd let you guys know I sell these units cheaper than what you mentioned above ^. I can also get the .91 T4 housing for them for a little bit extra. PM me if you want pricing, we try to keep a couple of them on hand
9208f991.jpg

385d4d04.jpg
 
ctdiesel99 said:
I just saw this thread, but figured I'd let you guys know I sell these units cheaper than what you mentioned above ^. I can also get the .91 T4 housing for them for a little bit extra. PM me if you want pricing, we try to keep a couple of them on hand
9208f991.jpg

385d4d04.jpg
Click to expand...
If its cheaper than what I posted, send me a pm please.
 
Agreed ive got quite a few i need to move if people actually need them ill make them a killer deal.
 
Love this turbo it spools just as fast or faster than my old II 64 74 14. Paid 1150 plus 185 for the .91 housing
 
Fmw 467

JamesHunter said:
Love this turbo it spools just as fast or faster than my old II 64 74 14. Paid 1150 plus 185 for the .91 housing
Click to expand...

That's the cheapest price I've seen so far.
Where if you don't mind posting?
Was that shipped?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top