WUnderwood
Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 8,418
anyone know what has been done to the motor to help it survive at those "inflated" power levels? I know what II charges for their "race engines"...
I was going to say a lot of stuff that I probably would have regretted in the morning but I won't. My Top Dragster/Top Diesel is a piece of **** bracket car but it's leading the points! I'm lucky but I also think I know how to race. Many here need to learn how to do that. You guys all make it hard to want to race and enjoy these events.
Inflated or not its still making over 1500 hp at the wheels at a minimum. Very very impressive numbers!anyone know what has been done to the motor to help it survive at those "inflated" power levels? I know what II charges for their "race engines"...
this engine vid is from like 2012. 2000-2500 according to sources. maxed engine dyno.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snrlNqHndfU
I sincerely disagree with you. The west coast correction factor has always been strong to quite strong, and thats putting it mildly.
Yellowstone Raceway in Montana, ran a 9.63@154.92 backed it up with a 10.54@154.99
I don't see anything about it being a dyno queen with those numbers today. Id say that's pretty decent.
Super street world record right there!
Yellowstone Raceway in Montana, ran a 9.63@154.92 backed it up with a 10.54@154.99
I don't see anything about it being a dyno queen with those numbers today. Id say that's pretty decent.
Maybe this dumb but a 10.54 backs up a 9.64??? I see the MPH is the same but shoot, the ETs are worlds apart.
Maybe this dumb but a 10.54 backs up a 9.64??? I see the MPH is the same but shoot, the ETs are worlds apart.
The record is for MPH, not ET. So ET doesn't matter.
Yellowstone Raceway in Montana, ran a 9.63@154.92 backed it up with a 10.54@154.99
I don't see anything about it being a dyno queen with those numbers today. Id say that's pretty decent.
That was in a Duramax or a Cummins? Looked to me like it was a Duramax.