24v spring comparison

Hamilton Cams

ignorant
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Messages
2,639
Here is a picture of some of the springs that have been traded in lately as well as a few of ours. Some are new and some have a few miles on them. This makes the research all the more fun because you get to see how the springs react with time and heat. As usual this is for information purposes. I would prefer if vendor names were kept out, so that this thing doesn't turn into a he said she said ass kickin contest. Although they can be lots of fun, of course.http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff203/zacheryhamilton/DSC01302.jpg

Data to come
 
Those are Cummins 24 valve staggered springs.

They are the latest rage...You put the heavy spring on the right front and light spring on the left rear.

Makes the truck handle better..............
 
No, you have it all wrong. You are supposed to use the heavy springs in a dry climate and the light springs in wet climates. Imagine if you hit deep water with the light springs, the valve float would keep you from sinking to the bottom.
 
Haha ! I never thought about it quite like that. Sorry it will be a couple of days before technical info gets finished. I apologize for the delay.

Zach
 
So higher seat pressure is better? The pressure in the cylinder should hold the valve shut? so why do we need high seat pressures? Seem like high seat pressures would equal more wear and tear on the cam, pushrods and rockers and bridges?
 
I get so busy working on new profiles and new products that I forget that just because I tell you my springs, cams, pushrods, and rockers are the best on the market that sometimes I need to slow down, research all of the data I have gotten and release it to you the public so that you can make up your own mind. I forget that everybody in the past has just told you their stuff was the best and didn't show you. Some of them might have even meant their stuff was the best in the Ford v8 gas world but just omitted gas and v8 part and just left the best part. I know this type of advertising is not going to cut it, neither is the pie charts and fluffy because I said so and my name is Gale crap.

When I started the Trade up to Hamilton Program, it was mainly a marketing tool. After I started looking at all of the stuff that people had been running, the specs new , and the specs after 50,000 miles I realized I might possibly have the best research tool to date on cummins valvetrain parts. Here is some of the data i have collected, some interesting facts, and some observations and specs on Hamilton products. Also I usually don't post names but all the stuff I am going to write is already out in the open just not all in one post.


When I started buying springs in the past they were expensive as hell first of all. Second no one would answer any spec questions. They would just say they are exactly what you need. I askd some f-1 dealers(no names) what seat pressure they had and just got the run around. I ordered a set from ats and just got what i guess was an acura spring with a bunch of shims. After I measured seat pressure it was 2lbs more than factory. At the nose it was about 10lbs more and coil bound before the factory spring did. I Looked at the bullydog spring kit at almost $1000. I did some research before I decided to buy, I talked to Farrell at PDR on a trip to B.C. and saw a set of Bully Dog springs that a customer had sent in with a head. When we measured they were almost 180 lbs at the seat. Can you believe people actually ran that stuff? Wow. The only thing that saved them was that oils had a lot more zinc back then! Next PDR finally got on board at 140lbs of seat pressure. With the zinc level in oils at the time 140lbs was no problem. To get 140lbs of seat pressure a thicker wire had to be used. This was no problem at the time but as cam profiles grew in duration and lift, stress on the cam lobe went up exponentially. With the thicker wire and higher lift coil bind started to become more of an issue. Next up was the F-1. They had a little more seat pressure than factory(around 85-87generally) but their main benefit was in the fact that they could handle higher lift cams and that they had less overall mass than other performance springs. The springs when new are decent and are definately an upgrade. They are a little weak on pressure for the profiles I run but they are ok. Now after looking at traded in f-1 springs I started to change my mind on them. Some of the new set I recieved had only 85-87lbs on the seat(not the 93lbs advertised) this is not much of an improvement over factory. A few sets that had a few miles on them were around 83lbs. and one set I recieved had less than factory. This is when the extra shotpeen and nitriding processes pays off........after 50k+. At $650 they were highway robbery. I started looking at other options and different manufactures. I talked to a few manufacturers that said that the 4.6l ford springs would fit and that they were a bit of an upgrade. Since they were already available tooling costs wouldn't be an issue, and the cost would be less, since they were already mass produced. I looked at them and then decided to go with a totally new design that had as many performance features as we could put into them. They laughed and said ok if you want to. I didn't think about what others were doing. But after further research it was obvious what was being done. Don has always said more seat pressure was not needed but now he is raising it. If he had a locked in design this would not be changing.

After looking at all of the springs that were traded in, here is pictures and some of the pressure data that I have found.
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff203/zacheryhamilton/DSC01302.jpg


from left to right is
Stock, F-1 used, F-1 new, HD110# used, HD110# new, PDR used, PDR used

seat pressure(1.38"), seat pressure at 1", and heighth at coil bind.

Stock-78-82lbs,162lbs, .871 -879"
F-1 new- 85-87lbs,205lbs, .805"
F-1 used 65lbs!, 154lbs, .791"
HD-new 108-111lbs, 242lbs, .779"
HD-used 106lbs, 239lbs .778"
PDR-used 134lbs, 285lbs .888"

The most damning evidence was the fact that the old f-1 springs had such low pressures. But to be completely fair to F-1 this might have been an old design, The new ones supposedly have slightly higher pressure. Also the Hamiltons tested had about 25,000 miles on them. I did not know the number of miles on the PDR springs but I believe they started life at 140lbs, the stock springs had about 40,000 miles on them.


The Hamilton 110# springs coil bound at the lowest heighth, because of the larger ovate wire with less coils.


This is a preliminary comparison that only accounts for the valve attributes at rest, we are in the process of having high-speed filming done to show all of these springs at 5000rpm with a performance cam profile.An interesting side note is that at 5000rpm on a 4stoke internal combustion engine, the valve opens 41.6 times per second! This is why it is so important to have the best spring you can.

Thanks,

Zach Hamilton

More data to come!
 
:clap:Zach you are truly the man behind the cam and springs.I don't see anyone else schooling the less informed folks.

thanks :clap:
 
I just recieved another brand of springs from our trade up program. This is a popular spring, and a good case in point for why Nitriding for corrosion resistance is so important. I dipped these in water for just a few minutes and look at the pitting and surface rust.

Also Here is a quote from Don M about Nitriding.........enjoy

Don M-Not to beat a dead horse, but nitriding for valve springs is a heat treating process. It is not a corrosion prevention process as the other vendors think and advertise.

http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff203/zacheryhamilton/DSC01333.jpg
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff203/zacheryhamilton/DSC01335.jpg

Zach
 
I first want to say I am not bashing anything, in fact I actually bought some of your springs, I just would like to know the effects of what is going on here.

seat pressure(1.38"), seat pressure at 1", and heighth at coil bind.

Stock-78-82lbs,162lbs, .871 -879"
F-1 new- 85-87lbs,205lbs, .805"
F-1 used 65lbs!, 154lbs, .791"
HD-new 108-111lbs, 242lbs, .779"
HD-used 106lbs, 239lbs .778"
PDR-used 134lbs, 285lbs .888"

So based on those numbers I believe the following to be true.

stock spring rate is approx 210lb/in
f1 is approx 315lb/in
HD is approx 340 lb/in
PDR is approx 397lb/in

Now, I do not know the true installed height of the sprngs but I am guessing from your numbers it is 1.38"

so even using a stock cam with a .235 intake lift that equates to approximate open pressures of

stock springs 134#
f1 159# (approx 18.5% increase over stock)
HD 190# (approx 41.8% increase over stock)
PDR 227# (apprix 69.4% increase over stock)

*Note Exhaust numbers would be even higher

SO... Obviously from higher spring pressure the first critical spring harmonic will be at a higher RPM. I don't know what that is, but it would be nice to know the differences between all of them. is this something we are going to find out on a spintron?

Also of note is the much higher forces on the camshaft from greater open pressure, it would be nice to know the effects of this as well, obviously if turning 7000RPMS the effects of 40% might be catastrophic??? but at our meager RPMS does it cause issues?
Does it mean the cam only lasts 200k miles instead of 400k miles?

Which also brings me to the point of retainers, are the stock one really made to handle that much more, no matter?

SO no matter who's springs you use, the forces involved are higher...I guess what I am asking is what now becomes the weak link in the system? What will break next?

Enquiring minds wanna know...or at least I wanna know.
 
Last edited:
I am trying to get the last couple of engines out this week before I head to vegas for sema, add the crazy springs sale in, and I don't have time to do math. I will get back to you and answer all of your questions when I get back from vegas.

By the way, a couple of things to factor into your calculations are the higher rocker ratio of the intake, percent increase of RPM, percent increase of boost, percent increase of lift on performance cams, and the much more agressive ramp rates of performance cams. Also installed heighths are a major factor in spring comparisons.

Our spring rate is 378lbs/inch. Also, 110# springs have a natural frequency of 42578 CPM

Zach
 
cool, look forward to seeing more info/comparisons to educate a dummy like me. It is greatly appreciated.

Remember not EVERYTHING that happens in Vegas has to stay in Vegas!
 
good because I will be colaborating on a new design on the p-pump cams in vegas. So hopefully that will come back with me.
 
Guys, guys, remember, its not the size of the spring-but rather, in how you twist it!!!! LOL
 
Cams, well, size matters, unless you hit something coming the other direction!:kick:
 
Any answer to my previous questions yet? I know things are probably hectic since Arriving back from Vegas, but my springs and pushrods were supposed to ship today, so I just would like some info as to what else I may need to do when they go in.

Thanks
 
One question, do diesels have water around the valve springs? Never even looked under my hood, except to check the oil. All my old gas valve springs are rusted, after lying out. I use PSI springs and they rust also, they run $1200 a set of 16
 
Back
Top