zukgod1
Old fart
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,397
Check out the pics,
I have a little un named turbo with
39.5 mm 10 blade inducer and 58.7mm exducer
The blades on this one are deeper, top of blade to base is longer than the kkk.
The second turbo is a kkk, K-24 with a
36.2 mm 12 blade inducer and 60.3mm exducer
The un named turbo has a Stainless exhaust housing and the kkk is cast.
I was unable to get the exhaust housing off the kkk to compair exhaust turbine.
The kkk compressor housing seems to be built for more flow as in it's more open inside, the un named turbo is more congested.
It's un named because there are NO marking to tell me what it is. The tag is gibberish and there are no A.R. markings on either housing although it looks about the same size.
So, with this info and the pics provided which do you belive would be better for my 1.6 Diesel Jetta?
Leaning towards the kkk but the features on the other turbo are appealing like the ss housing.
Sorry for the blury pics, had to use my phone.
dan
I have a little un named turbo with
39.5 mm 10 blade inducer and 58.7mm exducer
The blades on this one are deeper, top of blade to base is longer than the kkk.
The second turbo is a kkk, K-24 with a
36.2 mm 12 blade inducer and 60.3mm exducer
The un named turbo has a Stainless exhaust housing and the kkk is cast.
I was unable to get the exhaust housing off the kkk to compair exhaust turbine.
The kkk compressor housing seems to be built for more flow as in it's more open inside, the un named turbo is more congested.
It's un named because there are NO marking to tell me what it is. The tag is gibberish and there are no A.R. markings on either housing although it looks about the same size.
So, with this info and the pics provided which do you belive would be better for my 1.6 Diesel Jetta?
Leaning towards the kkk but the features on the other turbo are appealing like the ss housing.
Sorry for the blury pics, had to use my phone.
dan