I am lost why that would help? Still the same amount of exposure in a identical thickness of radiator?
it just travels further faster...same amount of exposure. It might work better for another reason...but why? Its not for the reason you so confidently stated...lol.
how much $$ do you have in it? Just curious
The pass through the core of the radiator is not the restriction...so its a 2inch vs 2inch comparison here. If it didd indeed take longer for the coolant to pass through...it would also take the coolant longer to pass through the block since its a fixed volume. So any additional cooling exposure due to time would be offset with equal exposure to heat.
It may work better...but it is not because of a change in mass flow rate....more likely due to a more uniform flow throughout the entire radiator...ie...less stagnant spots.
It may work better...but it is not because of a change in mass flow rate....more likely due to a more uniform flow throughout the entire radiator...ie...less stagnant spots.
Busy?LOLoke:Its sittin here ready to install just been really busy.