prochargedcumnz
farmer/ups'r
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2010
- Messages
- 317
You talking to me bro?
No I think we are on the same page. Mainly directed towards Illinoisram
You talking to me bro?
No I think we are on the same page. Mainly directed towards Illinoisram
Some of you guys need a sense of humor. I was merely trying to bring some levity to a touchy subject.Agreed!!!! The no adults or teeth comments are a little far from the truth... just my $.02
So other than a gutted cab and 3.0 turbo what is difference in 2.6 trucks if open driveline is passed ? So changes have be made to 3.0 also ! 2.5 class and current 3.0 class is better way !
I guess I shoulda worded that a little better, I was laughing also. A buddy and I had the same type of conversation the other night...Some of you guys need a sense of humor. I was merely trying to bring some levity to a touchy subject.
Sheesh
What's the difference between 2.6 and 2.5? couple tires, hanging weight, air to water, slight turbo difference, and a hood stack. 2.5 is the class that should have never happened IMO.
What's the difference between 2.6 and 2.5? couple tires, hanging weight, air to water, slight turbo difference, and a hood stack. 2.5 is the class that should have never happened IMO.
It would be easy to knock the weight class down 500# and go to single rear tires.
How come no one is really talking about dropping the weight to 7500 and changing he hitch height to 24, wont this assist in decreasing the breakage and look at staying with single rear tires .... or am I missing something?
How come no one is really talking about dropping the weight to 7500 and changing he hitch height to 24, wont this assist in decreasing the breakage and look at staying with single rear tires .... or am I missing something?