FYI-nobody asked about the Garrett. I'd assume TN is making the ceramic ball bearing turbo due to demand.
Well you know what they say about assumption. TN is making a ball bearing unit so they have something that competes with the other drop-in ball bearing alternative.
The drive pressure with the TN .84 is LESS than the Garrett with the 1.00...PERIOD
Really? I hadn't seen this information before. Care to post some data?
And for your information IT IS NOT A STOCK HOUSING!!!
Of course not, it's one you had made to fit on the TN. My point was it's still a .84 housing
You can put a stock housing on the Garrett, and a 1.15-but neither will fit on the TN drop in. Wonder why??
I have run a Garrett with the 1.15 with 230 CC hybrids, and it was a laggy pig. You agreed
LINK
I hardly agreed it would be a laggy pig with 230cc hybrids, I felt it would be laggy with MY setup (long ways from 230cc) I haven't driven a truck with hybrids and a 1.15 so I couldn't comment. Sounds like you have, thanks for the info.
Please stop the mis-information on all your anti TN posts. You run a 1.0 housing with a smaller than stock wheel.
What does what I run have to do with anything? LMAO I have driven a truck with a TN, have friends who have tested them, and have educated myself on each turbo. That's where I base my opinion. Furthermore, that's what my post is: my opinion. How can you call my posts misinformation when I simply state my experience and opinion.
I feel that the Garrett BB is a better choice than the current TN drop in. That's all. Not a reflection on you, your company, or TN. If the Turbonetics unit pans out and is better than the Garrett bb for a comparable price, I would love to run it when I get ready to purchase a turbo. Although when I contacted you about an intercooler for a friend, I was told "uh oh, Banks would be better". Perhaps Banks has a drop in ball bearing alternative you would recommend to me rather than the choices you have to offer?
Sure glad you're not the only one who sells TN/Spearco