zstroken
For $$$ your name here
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 23,151
zstroken: he cant dazzle you with brilliance, so he tries to baffle with bull****.
Says the guy who has no data... LOL
zstroken: he cant dazzle you with brilliance, so he tries to baffle with bull****.
its not my thread or my potential customers asking for it either...
You are correct, it's not your thread or your potential customers so if you don't have anything intelligent to add to the conversation I suggest you GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :ft::ft:
I wanna see a video of 40 drive vs 80 boosht!
:clap: You guys must have GREAT customer service too!
I guess asking the usual intelligent questions doesnt qualify here? I have the money to burn to try one, but the general attitude of those that represent this turbo make me want to spend it elsewhere.
No, he isn't a paying vendor. So nobody should care about his numbers. He's not publicly selling his ****. If he did have a thread pimping his ****, I'd be asking for some proof just like I am here. One guys bull**** logs and pre-k graph aren't enough. Why anyone would have spent 3k for a mystery turbo is beyond me. I'll stick with my cheap ass BW's.
I wanna see a video of 40 drive vs 80 boosht!
THIS! And a dyno sheet showing 1000hp+ on this mythical ratio.
The thing I have the hardest time with is 80psi from a s300 compressor and the much smaller drive numbers. Anything is possible but when something is far enough out of the range of normal anyone with any sense should question it a little.
waste of time asking it will never happen. they obviously have no way or intension to show anything and are now trying to ignore the subject and push the conversation to sh*tt*ng on me. :stab:
I've read most of Carl's threads and I've never seen him claim any unbelievable numbers. On this thread we saw claims of 2:1 boost/drive #'s and then nothing for 6 months to back that up. There is absolutely no way that truck is seeing 80 psi boost with those mods.
Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
The other logs seem a lot more believable to me, but the op is saying that an analog gauge is backing up the data logger readings for boost. If that's true, then you'd have to throw out the drive and vane position logs to make those #'s. I just can't see any way that he's going to make 86 psi boost with an 18cm housing and 70hp injectors. If the vane position was closed it'd make more sense but the drive #'s would be crazy high.<br />I've read most of Carl's threads and I've never seen him claim any unbelievable numbers. On this thread we saw claims of 2:1 boost/drive #'s and then nothing for 6 months to back that up. There is absolutely no way that truck is seeing 80 psi boost with those mods.<br />
<br />
Sent from my DROID X2 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
<br />
As in any engineering you can throw out the outlying data points, if you do, you end up with lots of boost greater than drive data. Look at the other logs, logs from completely seperate trucks.<br />
<br />
The numbers that carl does claim. Have you ever seen an ounce of data to back them up?