Big Swole
MegaInterceptor
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 16,950
kept the top one, driving the crd liberty till I get something to tame the beast.
:bang
Sorry Buddy! I was talking to Mike Q... mp105
lol
Thanks for sharing though...:lolly:
kept the top one, driving the crd liberty till I get something to tame the beast.
:bang
Sorry Buddy! I was talking to Mike Q... mp105
lol
Thanks for sharing though...:lolly:
Swole
That avatar suites you. WHEEEE
doug:snoop:
I can say with some level of authority that the 2003 SCI ECM is very simplistic in comparison to the 2004.5 ECM. The 2003 is very 'basic' but how that transfers into tunability is yet to be seen. The 2004.5+ SCI ECM's are quite similar to their CAN counterparts.
Cheers
Cindy
LOL
I know, Right!!!
That's my favorite commercial but I don't know why. It just makes me laugh. lol
Plus with the whole "Pig = Cop" thing... lol
I just thought it was fitting..
Atleast you have a sense of humor about it. My girls have recorded that commercial on their dvr just to re watch whenever they want.
Sometimes less parameters works well for tuning, sometimes it doesn't. Just take a look at the first Duramax LB7 OS in 2001. No one uses that OS if they can help it. The 2002 OS has much better functionality to deliver tuning results.Lol is this good or bad for us 03/04 owners. The suspense is getting hard to take! :bang
We just won't know the results until there are 2003 trucks running around with our tuning and users start comparing the results to 2004/5 trucks.I hear ya.
I am banking on good news.
We made hardware changes to FlashScan V2 to accommodate SCI in December 2010. All hardware shipped after that date is SCI compliant.Are there any anticipated changes in the unit itself that will be needed to be done, or is a unit purchased today going to be good to go when the software is released? ( tax return burning hole in pocket )
Sometimes less parameters works well for tuning, sometimes it doesn't. Just take a look at the first Duramax LB7 OS in 2001. No one uses that OS if they can help it. The 2002 OS has much better functionality to deliver tuning results.
Sometimes less is more because it's 'simpler' to get the desired tuning result without fighting other parameters.
We just won't know the results until there are 2003 trucks running around with our tuning and users start comparing the results to 2004/5 trucks.
I can offer up a 03 if someone wants to do some long distance tuning. When the time comes of course.
I'm in Alliance, NE
QCSB 4x4
Fuel- Floor-it 3.5, Flux 3's
Air- 62/71/14 over a S480, 87 turbine, 1.10ar
Tranny- Billet w/PCS controller
Engine- stock with head studs.