Performance Injector Breakdown - 12 Valve

Big Blue24

Comp Diesel Sponsor
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
6,320
The purpose of this thread is to discuss and display some of the performance modifications commonly found inside a 12 valve Cummins Injector. The injectors pictured made just over 700 HP and 1475 ft lbs with a maxed out 160 HP P7100 pump with modified 8mm delivery valves with a 028" shoulder, commonly referred to as DDP 024/042 valves.

This first picture displays a standard stock injector body on the left with edge filter in-tact, and the modified injector body on the right with edge filter removed.

Injectors5x208.jpg


The stock injector on the left has (1) feed passage down through the body that leads eventually to the nozzle. The modified injector on the right has (2) feed passages.

Injectors5x207.jpg


Looking in from the top side where the edge filter was removed, two sources of light can be seen on the dual feed passage injector body:

Injectors5x209.jpg


Injectors5x2010.jpg


Moving down to the nozzle, we have a factory stock 145* 5x.009" VCO nozzle on the left and on the right is an EDM modified factory stock 145* VCO nozzle that has been enlarged to 5 x .0195", more than double the stock nozzle orifice size:

Injectors5x206.jpg


On the cold side of the nozzle where it attaches to the body, the stock nozzle is on the left and the modified nozzle is on the right with an added feed passage that lines up with the added feed passage in the modified injector body. This passage is larger than 060" in diameter, the edges appear to have marking from electro-discharge machining but I do not know for sure if EDM was used or if a special drill bit could be utilized for this modification.

Injectors5x205.jpg


And finally we have a stock injector needle on the left, and modified needle on the right. The modified needle has had 030" cut off the tip. This decreases needle "throttling" as it creates a larger feed path to the nozzle orifices. On a stock needle, at low lift the needle nearly blocks the nozzle orifices which meters or throttles injection somewhat. The modified needle clearly allows for a larger fuel delivery path.

Injectors5x202.jpg


Injectors5x203.jpg


And finally, the stoke limiting collar is the last modification found on these performance injectors. Pictured is the stock needle on the left and the modified needle on the right which has had 020" removed from the stroke limiting collar. This translates to 020" of added needle lift on the modified injector which allows the needle to throttle even less and adds a little duration to the injection event as the needle has more travel before the needle valve covers the nozzle orifices.

Injectors5x204.jpg
 
Cone angle?

Using 2" long pin gauges on two orifices skipping (1) hole so the pin gauges were 144* apart, i come up with a cord length of exactly 3.501". Using trig cord length formula, 3.501=2r sin (144/2); radius calcs to 1.840". Therefore the cone angle triangle comes up with 2" legs for the sides and 3.680" for the base which creates a triangle representative of the cone angle at 133.85*.

In short, my calculations come up with 134* cone angle. If you factor in my measuring margin of error, I assume the cone angle is somewhere between 133* and 135* which obviously is tighter than the stock 145* pattern.

If you have an easier or more precise method for measuring cone angle, I like to learn and would be interested to know how the industry measures cone angle.
 
Last edited:
On a 5-hole nozzle angle the short side orifice, then both long side orifices, add the two long side orifice angles together and divide by two, then add the short and long side together to find the total cone angle.

I would be willing to bet a VCO nozzle the same hone size with a 155* cone angle and no needle or holder modifications would make more power.
 
On a 5-hole nozzle angle the short side orifice, then both long side orifices, add the two long side orifice angles together and divide by two, then add the short and long side together to find the total cone angle.

could you post up a picture of these measurements or drawing. not completely clear which angles being measured. I have a set of injectors trying to determine the spray angle on and this would help. thanks.
 
Two orifices on left are long side(flattest), one orifice on right is short side(steepest).

5P2.jpg

the angle measured is taken from long axis of the nozzle tip to the pin and not between the pins, correct? Thanks for pix.
 
Short side orifice.
ZN1_zps985161bb.jpg


Long side orifice.
ZN2_zps58676163.jpg


For example; this nozzle has a short side orifice angle of 57.5°, the two long side orifice angles are 97° and 98°. So 97+98/2 = 97.5, now 57.5+97.5 = 155° cone angle.
 
Correct, the two long side orifices are typically reverse angle or greater than 90°.
 
Back
Top