Chassis dyno highest power common rail single charger FUEL only?

Probably low for this forum but:

996.2 hp (4800 rpms) and 2124.1 ft/lb (1400 rpms) (2.6 charger, uncorrected)
 
Pretty sure some of Schieds common rails in the 3.0 trucks are north of 1400

Edit just saw on a chassis dyno...im pretty still pretty sure IF they did then it would be close but to my knowledge none of their truck have been on a chassis dyno (a public one anyways)
 
Last edited:
takedown95 said:
Probably low for this forum but:

996.2 hp (4800 rpms) and 2124.1 ft/lb (1400 rpms) (2.6 charger, uncorrected)
Click to expand...


Interesting...I'm assuming you dragged it backward on the dyno? What type of dyno? Turbo didn't snuff out at 1,400rpm? Damn.
 
This was 3+ years ago. Can't remember the exact numbers but i think bean said somewhere around 99xhp and 2500ish ft/lbs when the turbo let go.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtlOwE13OfQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtlOwE13OfQ[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=351i-GeoYQU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=351i-GeoYQU[/ame]
 
Torrey and crew pulled a 1246 RWHP uncorrected on my Superflow. Single promod 88mm fuel only.

I suppose the chassis dyno narrowed it up pretty much. Thought there would be more bites.
I'm not sure if I agree with the 20% number that seems to get thrown around for drive train loss but 1246 RWHP x 1.2 = 1495 flywheel for the CR sled puller's on engine dyno's that want to throw your hat in the ring.
 
The superflow seems to be the only one I've seen capable of snuffing a truck out. Not a dyno expert but...

phone
 
Joesixpack said:
Torrey and crew pulled a 1246 RWHP uncorrected on my Superflow. Single promod 88mm fuel only.

I suppose the chassis dyno narrowed it up pretty much. Thought there would be more bites.
I'm not sure if I agree with the 20% number that seems to get thrown around for drive train loss but 1246 RWHP x 1.2 = 1495 flywheel for the CR sled puller's on engine dyno's that want to throw your hat in the ring.
Click to expand...

That doesn't surprise me one bit, that whole team has got it together! Impressive for sure.
 
JSP seems to have forgotten to add that he has run 10xxwhp uncorrected on a single s480/96/1.32. Chris you will have to fill the xx's in.
 
JQmile said:
Interesting...I'm assuming you dragged it backward on the dyno? What type of dyno? Turbo didn't snuff out at 1,400rpm? Damn.
Click to expand...

Nope. Put it in 5th gear brought the rpms up and slipped the clutch to get the tires moving. Then dropped the rpms down and added the load. Hit the hammer and pulled from about 1200 to 5000. The beauty of a CR is that with big injectors you dont have to worry about snuffing the charger at 1400 rpms with the right tuning. The fact that it was a 6.7 is also helpful. Load cell dyno of course.

Joesixpack said:
Torrey and crew pulled a 1246 RWHP uncorrected on my Superflow. Single promod 88mm fuel only.

I suppose the chassis dyno narrowed it up pretty much. Thought there would be more bites.
I'm not sure if I agree with the 20% number that seems to get thrown around for drive train loss but 1246 RWHP x 1.2 = 1495 flywheel for the CR sled puller's on engine dyno's that want to throw your hat in the ring.
Click to expand...

I would maybe believe a 20% loss with an auto but not a manual. I think with a manual its more like 10%.
 
heavy duty industry: I use 25% for an automatic or manuals. Its been damn accurate with calibrated factory engines.
 
I know Haisley engine dynoed 2,162hp on a 12v on a 106mm single, so the turbo isn't the limiting factor. I know it's a 12v, not common rail, just throwing it in for context.
 
JQmile said:
I know Haisley engine dynoed 2,162hp on a 12v on a 106mm single, so the turbo isn't the limiting factor. I know it's a 12v, not common rail, just throwing it in for context.
Click to expand...

Good night! That's nuts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top