SledPuller21 said:
I dont understand...how would going to a flow thru connector tube decrease power? And why would Haisley, a company with a good reputation sell them? Not calling you out just wanting some reasoning and explanation for your claims. I would be able to tell if I gained power if I was going to TI's dyno day again tommorow but I'll be at a pull.
The answer is: The VP44 pumps a small amount fuel per stroke. The maximum total amount of fuel it can pump is fixed per stroke. No matter how efficiently you can fill the 3radial plungers, you are still stuck with 7.5mm diameter plungers and a few mm's of stroke or total plunger travel.
As the pump pressurizes the slug of fuel and begins to deliver it to the rotor head, delivery valves, lines, connector tubes, and finally the injector - the pressure rises. Any change in diameter of the components between the radial plungers and injection nozzle will lower the pressure rise. An ugly analogy would be a section diameter change in a fire hose. You would not start with a 2" hose at the truck and at then at the nozzle have it expand to 3" hose. This will lower the pressure of the liquid and slow velocity. The 4 valve head, the higher injecton pressure and the cross flow design of the 24V VP44 was specifically optimized to use a higher injection pressure. Dropping that pressure begins to work against those parameters for maximum performance.
Remember that emissions and optimized use of fuel goes hand and hand with all out performance as well. Most of all the same things apply to making the most HP as do emissive by-product reductions by the OEM's.
Things like high pressure fuel delivery that injects fuel quickly at high velocity, takes the fuel from a liquid state to a vapor state quickly, and cylinder head airflow to match the injected quantity. These are used by system designers on both sides of fence.
Making a rash section change in a pump, line, nozzle system like the P7100 or the VP44 is a receipe for lower pressure every time. The P7100's can be fitted with larger plungers and differing camshafts to change the volume of that slug of pressurized fuel and can use a larger diameter line in some cases.
We dynoed all kinds/sizes of lines, connector tubes, modified injector bodies, everything between the pump and the nozzle with no good results. Nothing! Some resulted in large power drops. As suspected.
Some companies and even individuals detest dyno work/results. For those people; track results are king. Either way, dyno or drag racing, the stock tube size has resulted in the most power on the dyno and the fastest VP44 trucks in existance using diesel fuel only.
Simply put, there are many untested and unproven parts in the market. Some are marginally tested, some are tested to extremes with everything in between.
None of this applies to the Common Rail systems that are an accumulator style fuel delivery system.