Scooter's Roofing
New member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 17,007
if Scheid would have beat Hamilton to market, they would be legal
if Scheid would have beat Hamilton to market, they would be legal
The ppl 2.6 rules read "stock appearing" , which in my opinion is open to interpretation.
if Scheid would have beat Hamilton to market, they would be legal
No I actually think 2.6 is too far outta hand an aftemarket heads and blocks should not be allowed. I have been on the anti 2.6 progression side for awhile. But people kept saying Pullin is expensive and a luxury so step up or go home. Now that has all settled down and here is a product that will help everybody from stock replacement to performance and now it's whoa that's to much never mind the other fifty plus grand in the truck. Seems to me people that already payed big money to work over a stock head are afraid of some competition!
It's all about the gray areas. The point it's at now, he'll yes let em run the Indy head or Hamilton. It's a luxury, nut up or stay home. Lol
That worked out so well for them and Haisley with the deck plates didnt it
I was told that I(llinois)TPA voted it down.
So a $400 Chinkanese aftermarket head that is manufatured and sold as a direct replacement should be illegal?
Do you call Zach's product a Chinkanese aftermarket head also? Or are you soley slandering Alabama Cylinder Head?
I've used Alabama heads and have no problem with them.
Indiana ITPA did too I believe.
Well if both are cast in China, you therefore have no issue with them being Chinkanese, you only have issue with poor quality.