If you have x internal area in the housing with a 83mm turbine, and you bore it out for a 96mm turbine, that x area is reduced. Unless your 74?mm exducer is your restriction, I think you just made the housing tighter than a .9
Since you're technically running a smaller a/r then, but with bigger wheel, would spool stay about the same?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
I did a back to back on the 83/74 and the 87/80 several years back. The 87 was harder to light.
This was the old 87 and not the current J-Trim 87?
Correct the older wheel.
I do remember vaguely the days of the s300.
66mm with 65mm turbine in a 14cm housing
66mm with 71mm turbine in a 14cm housing
66mm with 74mm turbine in a 14cm housing
65mm turbine was the easiest to light, and the 74mm was the hardest. I can't say it was back to back, but truck had minimal changes curing the swaps.
:what:
Sub'd for the info. Only experience I have is with the 83 and 87 wheel, both in a .9 and 1.0 T4 housing.
Les , ill let u know in a few weeks how that 96 wheel runs. Have a 75/96/1.10 t4 ill be running
I did a back to back on the 83/74 and the 87/80 several years back. The 87 was harder to light.
65mm turbine was the easiest to light, and the 74mm was the hardest. I can't say it was back to back, but truck had minimal changes curing the swaps.