So when will we know the detail on the air supply? I know E.D. wanted to be hush hush before the event. Also from the 8.2 vid from earlier compared to most recent 8.5, you were fueling much harder it seemed to get tje 8.5. Obviously elevation was a factor, but curious what temps you were seeing on the big end.
We ran the same tune, the added smoke was from being in elevation, we don't have our racepak installed yet so besides our engine dyno data we don't have egt information from the challenge.
Lavon
Just got too wondering why not go short wheelbase to save weight? Seems all the 2wd guys go 6ft bed, why not the 4wd guys? Just a random thought while burning wire.
A dyno video on Facebook showed up in my feed earlier.
2348hp/4002ft. lbs.!!
Was it corrected?
It was pretty much at sea level, so correction wasn't a factor, the RPM was calibrated off roller speed and the dyno sheet shows I lifted at 3400rpm and my data log shows I lifted at 3900rpm, so I was either spinning or the rpm was off, affecting the TQ number. Regardless, it doesn't change the HP but would be closer to 3500ft lbs accurading to the data log. I ran a tune that did around 2000hp on the engine dyno and hit it with two big nitrous solenoids on the dyno, so I think the hp is accurate. We were still running a tune that did 1472hp on the engine dyno for the drag strip and ran consistent 5.40s all day.
2348hp/4002ft. lbs.!!
Was this fuel only?
It was pretty much at sea level, so correction wasn't a factor, the RPM was calibrated off roller speed and the dyno sheet shows I lifted at 3400rpm and my data log shows I lifted at 3900rpm, so I was either spinning or the rpm was off, affecting the TQ number. Regardless, it doesn't change the HP but would be closer to 3500ft lbs accurading to the data log. I ran a tune that did around 2000hp on the engine dyno and hit it with two big nitrous solenoids on the dyno, so I think the hp is accurate. We were still running a tune that did 1472hp on the engine dyno for the drag strip and ran consistent 5.40s all day.