how many out there are building 2.5 trucks

When the 2.5 becomes the 2.6. Do you agree that the rules should be like street stock? Include hanging weight but like said above on boxes. What about warter to air inercoolers? Dually tires only on factors dual trucks?
 
no air to water, i am mixed on duals rule, if anything make it a srw class and keep carnage down
 
2001cummins said:
When the 2.5 becomes the 2.6. Do you agree that the rules should be like street stock? Include hanging weight but like said above on boxes. What about warter to air inercoolers? Dually tires only on factors dual trucks?
Click to expand...

house said:
no air to water, i am mixed on duals rule, if anything make it a srw class and keep carnage down
Click to expand...


3 things will help on the power in this class

2.5 true bore
no air to water
t4

Curious how much.
 
I'm gonna assume he means not to allow t4 footed chargers. I think the single wheel only thing would suck for those people that truly have a one ton.
 
BRE said:
I'm gonna assume he means not to allow t4 footed chargers. I think the single wheel only thing would suck for those people that truly have a one ton.
Click to expand...


T4 chargers are legal. The 1200ish HP 2.6 trucks are using t6.
 
i am at the point 2.5 or 2.6.. I think 2.6 will be gone in a few years
 
I think 2.6 will stay around for awhile. But I also think 2.5 is going to become a pretty hot class. I built my truck for 2.5.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
2.5 is taking off pretty well here. Right now there is a good progression between classes. I agree with Dan, 2.5 needs to stay T4, no clipped wheels, and air/air.

2.5 - 800-900
2.6 - 1100-1200
3.0 - 1400-1500
 
BluegrassDiesel said:
2.5 is taking off pretty well here. Right now there is a good progression between classes. I agree with Dan, 2.5 needs to stay T4, no clipped wheels, and air/air.

2.5 - 800-900
2.6 - 1100-1200
3.0 - 1400-1500
Click to expand...

This...
Which is also why my truck never be more than a workstock truck lol
 
I think it should be srw for a factory srw and duals for a factory dual truck. I do not agree with allowing duals on srw trucks in the 2.5 class
 
I thought the whole point of 2.5 was to limit hp. Why do they refuse to make good turbo rules
 
99GreenCummins said:
I think it should be srw for a factory srw and duals for a factory dual truck. I do not agree with allowing duals on srw trucks in the 2.5 class
Click to expand...

Then a dually with dual 35's and horsepower will win 90% of time more traction. SRW class would make if fun and less parts to break
 
What about letting them run a zz runner on the mechanical trucks, newer trucks are running programmers that are not factory...just curious of your thoughts on that
 
Most of the rules I have seen have said no runner intakes....
 
Same as I have read , but I find it interesting that no one questions programmers in this class...somewhat quick hp....lolo...and in today's market they give you a lot of options inside programmer, fuel deliver, timing advancement and ect
 
Teamfreeman04 said:
Same as I have read , but I find it interesting that no one questions programmers in this class...somewhat quick hp....lolo...and in today's market they give you a lot of options inside programmer, fuel deliver, timing advancement and ect
Click to expand...

It's not a stock class. Programming open as you could run a 13mm on a mechanical truck.
 
zstroken said:
Most of the rules I have seen have said no runner intakes....
Click to expand...

I agree. Should be stock style Some are getting away with the bb tooling in 2.5 but I still think that should be no go!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top