malibu795
2wd numb nut
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Messages
- 6,731
I would expect the difference to be even more pronounced if you can load the sled.
as in 50, 100, 150 more hp?
I would expect the difference to be even more pronounced if you can load the sled.
It has been proven on a dyno that a bushed charger makes more HP than the same native charger. If you want to run a bushed charger step up to the 2.8.
as in 50, 100, 150 more hp?
Whos side are you for here?
I cant stand the fact the a local guy i know bought a 2600$ ED charger for the 2.6 class and that is okay but if a guy buys a 1000-1200$ dollar charger and throw a hundred dollar bushing in it, that is not okay. If there was a easy way to set it say at a factory production 2.6 wheel, then fantastic. Who in the hell would be able tell if it is a factory wheel or not? If the comment about running a 2.8 bushed to a 2.6, then step up to the 2.8 class was directed towards my turbo, then i will say hows that fair. I will drive mine to the pulls. The 2.8 class is not street drivin and we all know that. They are just 3.0 pullers without the open driveline. Why not tell them to step up a class? And my point being with all this, where do you stop? Everybody wants it fair but hates rules. They cannot tech all turbos fairly so just make it simple with the 2.6 plug. Tim
Been between 50 and 100 hp on the dyno.
Well when you said spec charger, I figured you meant one size fits all.
No sides, just seeing too many guys bushing down big chargers for a 2.6. Get a wheel with a 2.6 inducer.
Ahhhh....2.6 class……. here we go....:dead-horse-fast2:
The Class of Turbo Tomfoolery!!!..... :charger:
op:
Do not waste your money. That isnt enough.my plan was to run a GT4094 back cut to 2.6 and gated
Bingo! To me the best rules would 2.6" inducer max. the Wheel tip must protude into the 2.6 bore. Then pick an exducer limit. But that is a pain to tech. Pulling covers is a pain and meaure wheels with odd number blade counts is another pain.This has become a 100% pointless debate.
We all know what the right thing to do is. However...
a) organizations/techs don't have the inclination or time to inspect wheels;
b) pullers whine like little girls if they're asked to remove their compressor cover. Some wouldn't even have the foggiest idea how.
Therefore the rule will stand and anything said to the contrary will be shot down. And you can take that to the bank.
Way to F - up my avatar!:hehe:66mm inducer, 105 exducer
Not so. NADM WS has been the largest class this year, I would say almost double in size from 08.Fact is, the work stock class has almost disapeard and is now the 2.6 class. !
Bingo! To me the best rules would 2.6" inducer max. the Wheel tip must protude into the 2.6 bore. Then pick an exducer limit. But that is a pain to tech. Pulling covers is a pain and meaure wheels with odd number blade counts is another pain.
Simple rule for simple people. The rest of will play where there is no limits and a lot less whining.
Way to F - up my avatar!:hehe:
I agree, the exducer is a pain to check, but the wheel tips extending into the bore is a good start.