My question is how would have BD handle this if you would have been one of there distributors? i bet they would have taken it back and had a new one on the way!!
How did BD prove the oiling issue was not caused by debris in the turbo feed port that restricted flow and starved the turbo for oil?
They might have even found the blockage during their inspection and then cleared it just to skip out on the warranty claim that should have gone up the food chain one more step to the original builder (Borg).
If the oil deprivation was not caused by the customer's negligence, the damage should be warrantied and corrected at no cost to the customer.
The problem is, how do you or BD prove which party caused the oil deprivation?
I had a new turbo fail within 90 miles once. The warranty pic of the shaft looked exactly like yours and they claimed oiling issue too.
They rebuilt with a new turbine shaft and bearings for $3xx. 15k miles later that same turbo is still good. I changed NOTHING with the oiling side of it. ???
I still don't know what to think...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
You know exactly what to think! LOL
if the original turbo was fine and the repaired turbo is fine, the first "new" turbo had a manufacturing defect. plain and simple
I've been thinking on this for a bit and trying to figure out what I think I see in hectors photos.
My estimation is that the thrust bearing and one journal didn't receive enough oil. The other journal looks dry and one has oil coking from heat.
I can't see this BW chart or have much training on turbo failure analysis.
I'm not sure how one could claim lack of lube if the failed parts have oil on them? I understand a restriction could have been present.
From my Not-So-Smart phone
Keep em coming guys! Thanks for the support. I'm going to work on getting this petition together.