rush
New member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Messages
- 319
The only thing the NOS is saying is that the truck needed more air, every 6.4 thats posted was done on stock chargers too...
I believe Buck's was stock charger.
The only thing the NOS is saying is that the truck needed more air, every 6.4 thats posted was done on stock chargers too...
I believe Buck's was stock charger.
See on trentnells truck N2O is good for another .1-.2 in the quarter but on a 6.4 it can be good for .5 or possibly more, meaning the fuel is there, but the air is not... the fuel only numbers from the duramax guys are nuts for sure...
That was my best guess , with the size of my twins ( s366/s480 ) there isnt much fuel left over to burn............ when it was on a single cp3 anyway , i have a bottle on my truck but have never used it :nail: . As far as the 1/8 to 1/4 mile predictions , its too hard to get a good guess IMOP , my 7.3 1/8 guesses out to be 11.16 instead of 11.63 ..............
That was my best guess , with the size of my twins ( s366/s480 ) there isnt much fuel left over to burn............ when it was on a single cp3 anyway , i have a bottle on my truck but have never used it :nail: . As far as the 1/8 to 1/4 mile predictions , its too hard to get a good guess IMOP , my 7.3 1/8 guesses out to be 11.16 instead of 11.63 ..............
I'm very impressed with what the 6.4 guys are coming up with for no longer than the trucks have been available, just look back at the dmax at the beginning and now, great things ahead for the 6.4. Contgrats guys. It high time you had something good to cheer about.:clap:
Your numbers wont be matched by a 6.4 anytime soon, but im glad we finally have a good platform to start with. Your numbers blow my mind man... honestly 9.80's:rockwoot: badazz