CurtisEmery
New member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 418
Not sure why he is bringing up prostock tractor hp in a semi pulling thread? Comparing 680ci tractor hp to 1000+ci semi pulling engines is mildly retarded imo.
Not sure why he is bringing up prostock tractor hp in a semi pulling thread? Comparing 680ci tractor hp to 1000+ci semi pulling engines is mildly retarded imo.
Not sure why he is bringing up prostock tractor hp in a semi pulling thread? Comparing 680ci tractor hp to 1000+ci semi pulling engines is mildly retarded imo.
Bring yours over here, you have more money.Bravo, You keep doing what your doing. To guys like Leiffi it doesn't matter if you were to make 3K hp out of a lawnmower engine he would claim someone somewhere did it better, or you used the wrong dyno.
Me and others on here tend to not chit on others accomplishments, especially when we haven't done anything better. This is a trait Leiffi should adopt.
Leiffi if you or someone in your country has something better, bring it over and show us what we're missing. We now have a few electronic Cat's running with the sigmas and I'm sure they would love to have you come and school everyone with your million HP L10.LOL
What, why ?Hub dyno? Stop, just stop, you obviously don't have a clue.
Bring yours over here, you have more money.
Electronic Cats with Sigmas, how is that electronic ?
Same pump, same turbo, cant be much difference in power. Pump is spinning slower in trucks so it gives less fuel.
We are always on the lookout for new ECU systems and I think we found one with an open control strategy that fit our needs so we can program the ECU to what we want with only the hardware restrictions like I/O…...
It will be for a hi end marked as you will need a bigger budged for these ECU systems and there is a load of things in there you really not need for most motor sport applications so why invest time? The simple variant on things is more options in the box.
Just an example. Rail pressure monitoring can be done on a crank position bases so just before the start of injection you can take a pressure sample and correct injector duration to the fuel metering you want. Theoretically this looks correct But in reality chance is your reading the pressure waves inside the Commonrail so your engine ends up running like a bad tuned piano under very hi load as we discover on the XPI Commonrail engines where the AFR was all over the place having the pressure sensing flat out on the on the 1280ECU we use on most projects so we had to calm things down on the sensing part and get RMS reading programmed in making it possible to monitor the raw and RMS pressure reading having up to 500Bar pressure differential @ some load points.
So loads of new things and options for gathering data on this new ECU system but simple control strategies will make things easier most of the time as you can also go more advance if needed but for motor sport we are not out there to set new emission standards. Most of the time they tell you if it smokes. :lolly:
Bring yours over here, you have more money.
Electronic Cats with Sigmas, how is that electronic ?
Hey Leiffi, you think Tallboy is an idiot, we get it. So instead of imparting your vast wealth of knowledge the sorry, uneducated, obstinate slob, why not just sit back and watch him fail? Stop being so magnanimous. He's obviously on the cusp of loosing his business judging by the quantity of high end work that goes thru his shop. When he goes under, you'll rule the industry over there.
And how did you come into that conclusion ? He knows his stuff, Adaptronic, but not what I need to know, OEM ECM. He might also have something to learn about turbos, exhaust manifolds, injection timing and so on, but dont we all ?Hey Leiffi, you think Tallboy is an idiot, we get it.
Electronic Cats are now competing and hanging with Sigma powered trucks. US Trucks have went over there to play. J.R.Collins took his Mack to Holland in like 2008.
1693 ?Well that's kind of an idiotic question...
Overhead cam...