Chris Blevins
New member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Messages
- 258
I've been waiting on a cam from Don for 2 months now.... I need one bad.
Fishin2Deep4U said:You are making the assumption that all cams are starting out with the same peak lift values. I have no idea when Don gets his cams if they have a greater height as a blank, but I know my test cams for the car are built that way.
So, while you are correct, if you start out with the same peak height, then you must grind the same amount off the base circle to get the same lift. What I am saying is, I am not sure what Don uses for blanks. Maybe he can get materials you cannot. I dunno.
Fishin2Deep4U said:I don't think I would compare anything in these motors to a SBC. We tried a custom grind in the Pontiac that had a bit smaller base circle. We ended up cracking 5 of the bores due to side loading and lift. The problem was fixed by increasing the base circle at the same lift and adjusting the top end installed height. No other changes were made to the lift profile.
Fishin2Deep4U said:If I understand you correctly, grinding the base circle does not affect the thickness of the hardening or possibly gets through it? Let me put it another way. Why do reground cams have a higher lobe failure rate than those that come from new blanks?
Again, not saying anyone is right or wrong. I am just offering my 2 cents based on what I have run into.
Dave
COMP461 said:I don’t know squat about injectors , I don’t need to , I only need to call on people like Brady Williams at Industrial Injections , give them my data , and let them make the corresponding changes to the physical injector. So untill now I have not called Don on his BS
duke1n said:Fish is Dave not Don. Sorry if that was "vicous" lol
COMP461 said:which I believe is either Don or Some one acting in his proxy to help him prove his erroneously points.
COMP461 said:Ok Don this is getting silly, you can not have the lobe be any higher then the bearing journals. If it did the cam would not slide past the bearings and in to the motor.
Don's cams, my cams , and everyone else’s have the peak of the lobe on the same height as the journals , the material is taken off on the back side .
I know of over 100 reground cams from Buddha Power and people like Brian Block AKA KTAcummins and not one failure. It seems like you would like to spout facts made up facts to fit your needs DON.
Now when It come to camshaft and valve train design, this is a field where I have a little more knowledge base , and where I have a depth of understanding of the attributes of what it takes to physically grind a cam and make it work as expected . I trust the more then 100 years of experience from the people at Bullet cams which grind thousands of cams a month, to include my 10 to 15 cams. They have had a good laugh at the words that Don and his proxy have written and deemed them to be absolute horse crap.
LMAO!
COMP, you are wrong, again. Look at the photos of the regrind below. Look at the "step" in the cam lobe from Cummins. This step is always ground away on the base circle and the nose. So, yes you do grind away material on the cam nose. And NO, your regrind does not have the same peak nose height as the helix or the stock cam. Your regrind is over 40 thou out of normal parameters. Probably more in some cases. It is apparent Bullet has little to no experience with a Cummins block or they would understand why the lobe width needs to be .715" and why the cam nose height needs to be as close as possible to the journal height. This is very true in the 2nd gen 12V and 24V engines and important as hell to controlling wear and keeping the geometry correct. Seems like another example of what gasser shops do when they assume the Cummins is just another engine and apply the old school regrind tricks to cams.
Remember that Cummins will sell a recon block, a recon rod, injectors, pumps, etc but they NEVER sell recon camshafts. Ever wonder why? It is because a Cummins cam needs the step and nose height as designed and a regrind cant meet that spec.