162k.
yes. left the line at 4,000, pulled about 3800 down the track.
Never got over 1400 on that pull. That was the hottest it's ever been with this setup. The max i've been able to see on the street is also 1400. I see more boost on the street (a little over 70psi) than I do pulling the sled (a little over 60 psi)
thanks joe, you pretty much said it for me.
um, ok.
2007 5.9;786055 Is being too lean just as bad as being too fat?[/QUOTE said:This has been an argument for a long time.. Too rich is bad in a diesel. Too lean is bad in a gasser.. Leaning out a diesel with N2o or H2o is bad. Leaning out a diesel electronically (i.e. de-fueling at high rpm) is naughty... I believe (Overfueled) had the same thing happen to his truck when he went down the 1/4 mile with 5.13's and ran against the governor most of the track...
You might want to verify that your EGT probe was giving correct readings. It sure seems like it would take a lot more EGT to burn the motor that fast.
Look at piston #6 closely, seems to be the beginning result, and piston #1 is the end result. Now which part of the piston would be first to fail if subjected to more of the combustion heat?
He only saw a max of 1400 egt. The truck sounded the same as it always does. He said he felt a loss of power so he backed out of it. When he lifted the upper rad hose blew off. When he felt the loss of power he checked his water temp and egt and said the egt was 1400 and water temp was normal. None of us had any clue the engine was hurt untill he tryed to start it.
Joe
Wow man! I'm really sorry to see that. I agree with checking the pyro probe. Nothing else adds up.
Look at piston #6 closely, seems to be the beginning result, and piston #1 is the end result. Now which part of the piston would be first to fail if subjected to more of the combustion heat?
what cylinder had the hole in the valve?
There was a clue, look at the blow by in the vid, its not too bad during the pull, but right at the end there was WAY more, right around when he lifted.
When I was testing in the winter (-40) It was running super lean, flux 5's on kill and data logged 2000 on the pyro (high as it could read anyways) only for very short time.
Does the MP8 add some timing aswell? Most carnage I've seen like this was caused from too much timing and/or too much rail pressure, and/or inectors going bad. Not bashing the MP8, but I have seen MP8 stacks cause injectors to go bad. A truck that pulled with us some last year had pretty much the same carnage yours has on the same pistons. He ran a BD Crazy Larry, TST, and Edge Juice, stock injectors, cp3 and turbo. half the injectors we cracked and the extreme timing he had with the electronics stack he had was the source of the problem.
Then from Madselectronics:SW9, timing 4, rail pressure 1
mp8 80%, 26k max rail pressure
EGT 1400 MAX
Flux 4
64/S480
Plenty of air, mild injector, mild rail pressure, timing dialed back,
Then from Madselectronics:
Smarty S04 and S06
Injection Timing
# 0 - Default
# 1 - Stock
# 2 - for stock injectors
# 3 - for aftermarket Injectors ( less advanced than # 2 )
# 4 - for fuel economy ( more timing advance than level # 2 )
The timing was advanced not dialed back on level 4 =\
Then from Madselectronics:
Smarty S04 and S06
Injection Timing
# 0 - Default
# 1 - Stock
# 2 - for stock injectors
# 3 - for aftermarket Injectors ( less advanced than # 2 )
# 4 - for fuel economy ( more timing advance than level # 2 )
The timing was advanced not dialed back on level 4 =\
Then from Madselectronics:
Smarty S04 and S06
Injection Timing
# 0 - Default
# 1 - Stock
# 2 - for stock injectors
# 3 - for aftermarket Injectors ( less advanced than # 2 )
# 4 - for fuel economy ( more timing advance than level # 2 )
The timing was advanced not dialed back on level 4 =\
That is true if you are running REVO non TNT....here is the timing breakdown for REVO TNT timing...
Injection Timing:
# 0 - Default
# 1 - Stock
# 2 - for aftermarket injectors
# 3 - for Hugh aftermarket Injectors ( less timing advance than # 2 )
# 4 – for use with NOs ( less timing advance than level # 3 )
So JP was using the second to least timing avail with #1 stock timing being the least.
Wonder why Cummins went back to a re-entrant piston with the 6.7L. I've been seeing too many of these failures lately, it's unsettling.
Look at the PDF for the TNT software. He's got the TNT/r. #4 is less advanced then 3Then from Madselectronics:
Smarty S04 and S06
Injection Timing
# 0 - Default
# 1 - Stock
# 2 - for stock injectors
# 3 - for aftermarket Injectors ( less advanced than # 2 )
# 4 - for fuel economy ( more timing advance than level # 2 )
The timing was advanced not dialed back on level 4 =\