Someone had to do it, cummins tubular manifold.

Header on the "Killer" Mack
DSC09379.jpg
 
Doesn't configuring the turbo like that add a bunch of thrust load to the CHRA bushings?
 
RacinDuallie said:
Think about what you just wrote here..... your describing a manifold. the exhaust pulses dump into a runner where the rest of the exhaust pulses dump into where they then collect and dump into the T- flange. The header has a different design using cylinder outlet primaries which are individual and meet in a smooth transition that the merge collector provides,then the T- flange. Weston was pretty damned dead on with the call of 1.25-1.5 for the header and 2.0 for the log style manifold. You want it close to the size of the port outlet.:charger:
Click to expand...


Weather it's a manifold or a header... your still going to have drive PSI/ back PSI in the header or the manifold!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Put a pressure gauge on your header and see... I did! And the gauge don't pulse!
 
XLR8R said:
Doesn't configuring the turbo like that add a bunch of thrust load to the CHRA bushings?
Click to expand...

it will also cause oil to leak into the ex housing and have a tendency to starve the comp side bearings.:bang
 
brushpuller said:
Weather it's a manifold or a header... your still going to have drive PSI/ back PSI in the header or the manifold!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Put a pressure gauge on your header and see... I did! And the gauge don't pulse!
Click to expand...
I have a back pressure gauge which was in a stock manifold that beat itself to death from the pulses. Are you saying a full log manifold doesn't pulse at all?
 
you guys should check out "Scientific Design of Exhaust & Intake Systems," it can be had from Amazon.com for $20.

I think it has already been mentioned that all manifolds/headers will pulse, but those designed to maintain and even possibly magnify those pulse waves are going to improve performance. Although log manifolds do pulse, their design fails to convey those pressure waves optimally - and also the optimum flow velocity
 
Hurley said:
you guys should check out "Scientific Design of Exhaust & Intake Systems," it can be had from Amazon.com for $20.
Click to expand...

It's a good read - I've had my copy for 3 decades - but there are recent books that contain more relevant info.

brushpuller said:
Weather it's a manifold or a header... your still going to have drive PSI/ back PSI in the header or the manifold!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Put a pressure gauge on your header and see... I did! And the gauge don't pulse!
Click to expand...

Turbine Inlet Pressure & pulse waves certainly aren't mutually exclusive... standard gauges typically don't have the resolution to display individual pressure waves.

Also, Brandon, improperly designed TIP gauges can vibrate excessively from the CTD's harmonics and fail prematurely.
 
It's a good read - I've had my copy for 3 decades - but there are recent books that contain more relevant info.
Click to expand...


Could you shed some light on those books? I've not been able to find anything else with my searching....and boy do I feel young
 
Look, im not arguing with your guys about this, im just tryn to help out. Iv already done months of testing and already been down this road. Just tryn to save some of ya some time! This is the last post im puting on here... pulses DO NOT effect the driving of the turbo NEAR as much as exhaust air speed!
 
Last edited:
They're rather closely related - pulse frequency, duration & velocity are by necessity directly proportional to exhaust gas speed.

Pulse retention is a primary design factor for divided plenum manifolds and divided volute turbine housings.

We even fabricate divided T3 flanges for that very reason.
 
Hurley said:
Could you shed some light on those books? I've not been able to find anything else with my searching....and boy do I feel young
Click to expand...

Sir Henry Ricardo is a good place to start, and once you've digested Smith & Morrison you should read Hugh MacInnes (not quite as dated)... Mark Warner isn't too bad - fewer typos & mathematical errors than Corky Bell (which I don't recommend), and of course the relatively recent A. Graham Bell books are very helpful.

Those Aussies & Kiwis really know their stuff when it comes to high performance! :bow:
 
XLR8R said:
Also, Brandon, improperly designed TIP gauges can vibrate excessively from the CTD's harmonics and fail prematurely.
Click to expand...

Well, it was a 150psi air pressure gauge from an air compressor. :hehe: I definitely recommend steel wool or some sort of filter before the gauge. I believe it was the soot that finally killed it. Any other tips for TIP gauges?
 
A soot filter and condensate coil are de rigueur for a diesel, and a stainless steel coil will survive best on a CTD.
 
joefarmer said:
Well, it was a 150psi air pressure gauge from an air compressor. :hehe: I definitely recommend steel wool or some sort of filter before the gauge. I believe it was the soot that finally killed it. Any other tips for TIP gauges?
Click to expand...

in steam lines they have a circle bent up and put water in it so the steam doesn't eat away the gauge i would do the same w/ this only oil?
 
A tuned header isn't all ways equal length. The books mentioned are informative but I wouldn't hold them as gospel. They will explain alot of the therories behind header desing. I've seen alot of book desinged headers fall flat on their face on the dyno and the track. I know of a few popular pro stock teams that we've helped that have piles of headers in the corner that don't work. I wished it was as easy as reading a book. Throw a low rpm high torque engine that relies heavily on boost to shove air throughit into the equation and it's a differant ball game. As stated earlier in this thread equal length isn't quite a criticall on a turboed engine. I thinks it is still something to pay attention to. To toatally discredit it is foolish. The few things I've figured out is the diameter likes to be about 1.5" for up to about 600hp. 1.625" for above about 600hp. Length either way likes about 11" primaries and 6" secondairies. I also like to collect the front three together and the back three together 6-8" before the turbo. I've seen some improvement spooling by doing this. I belive it gets all the waves trucking straight before the turbo.Allowing the turbo to collect your header I belive creates turbulance and a restiction.
 
jcj said:
A tuned header isn't all ways equal length. The books mentioned are informative but I wouldn't hold them as gospel. They will explain alot of the therories behind header desing. I've seen alot of book desinged headers fall flat on their face on the dyno and the track. I know of a few popular pro stock teams that we've helped that have piles of headers in the corner that don't work. I wished it was as easy as reading a book. Throw a low rpm high torque engine that relies heavily on boost to shove air throughit into the equation and it's a differant ball game. As stated earlier in this thread equal length isn't quite a criticall on a turboed engine. I thinks it is still something to pay attention to. To toatally discredit it is foolish. The few things I've figured out is the diameter likes to be about 1.5" for up to about 600hp. 1.625" for above about 600hp. Length either way likes about 11" primaries and 6" secondairies. I also like to collect the front three together and the back three together 6-8" before the turbo. I've seen some improvement spooling by doing this. I belive it gets all the waves trucking straight before the turbo.Allowing the turbo to collect your header I belive creates turbulance and a restiction.
Click to expand...

good post!!! :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top