Joesixpack
Pull'n it.
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,118
Yeah that post is going to look funny when I throw one of the wife back up...LOL
U D C
- Thread starter black03cummins
- Start date
WV Stud
Hillbilly
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2011
- Messages
- 260
So what do you want ? You sit here and talk about switching ecms,but yet you put it down in another post ?
Talk about people "pimping" you whine about not having efi on multiple forums...If it makes ya feel any better I will let ya drive my 06 as long as you promise not to come back pimpin!!
full pull
Sales&Support Valair Inc
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,683
WOW!
Should we be excited about this?
1 dongle, Is this progress?
New SMARTY UDC slogan
"Changing the Diesel world one DONGLE at a time"
Last edited:
JasonCzerak
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 14,827
mulisha
New member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,522
wow man you really are out there...as far as the new tnt-r..ive seen dozens and dozens of posts where people dont like it at all,since the day it came out. not as strong as the original and runs hotter, ect......my truck with tnt-r and the mp-8 on 70% always ran around 11.6 at 118...now with efi not only do i drive around everyday in the same tune that i race in,which i could never do with tnt-r but i dont use the mp-8 anymore, which netted me 40+hp, and i spray only water now, compared to washer fluid with tnt-r, and that netted me 20 -30 hp..i can run 11.3's all day now at 120...NOT EVEN CLOSE comparing the two..your just pissed cause it aint out for you...i dont need to show you time slips for anything.i ran tnt-r for 3 years , and over 150 track runs..ive only had efi now for 6 month's...and its truly a pleasure to drive....youve called out many people in the last few months, ive looked at all your posts.....its ridiculous..i always stood up for you when other people had something negative to say about you...but not anymore......FY
mulisha
New member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,522
pay him no attention.......just go back and look at his last 50 posts..hes just mad at the world...hes also getting his name out there, i went to a dyno event in town last week and there were people talking about him, and that over 200 miles away ..
K80
New member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2011
- Messages
- 490
I was thinkin that for a while. WTF is a dongle?! Then I googled it and was kinda surprised to learn its just a funny word for a cable.
Valair1
Valair Inc. Clutch
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,498
He might, I might just buy him everything he needs to get a 06 ecm on his truck, I'm tired of hearing him biatch about this.
JasonCzerak
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 14,827
after him, buy me the parts too!!!
StainlessRRA
Advocatus diaboli
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,316
Isn't *****ing like this typically reserved for the off season?
AH64ID
New member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2008
- Messages
- 883
I had an unexpected chance to dyno today. Last time I dyno'd was in 08 with the JR on SW3, stock turbo, and stock cam.
The new graph is much smoother! This is smoothing on zero. The below numbers are uncorrected, the corrected numbers are 414/850. I am impressed how flat the torque curve is, and how consistent the numbers were on runs 2 and 3. Run #1 was PoD on 70, I was curious how it effected WOT power, and it's pretty obvious. Run #2 was PoD on 85, which is were I run normally and my gauges told me it was the same power as PoD99, which I was able to verify. The throttle and power are smoother on PoD85 when towing, and the smoke is also down a little (not that it really smokes anyhow).
My previous dyno was 387/712 (437/808), so I am down a few hp but up quite a bit of torque. For how I use the truck this is just fine, and I won't be looking for that lost hp.
My timing is pretty tame, peak about 20°. I am sure that I could get more power from timing, but I do plenty of towing with the truck and want to be on the safe side.
Smoothing 0, Uncorrected
Smoothing 2, Corrected
The new graph is much smoother! This is smoothing on zero. The below numbers are uncorrected, the corrected numbers are 414/850. I am impressed how flat the torque curve is, and how consistent the numbers were on runs 2 and 3. Run #1 was PoD on 70, I was curious how it effected WOT power, and it's pretty obvious. Run #2 was PoD on 85, which is were I run normally and my gauges told me it was the same power as PoD99, which I was able to verify. The throttle and power are smoother on PoD85 when towing, and the smoke is also down a little (not that it really smokes anyhow).
My previous dyno was 387/712 (437/808), so I am down a few hp but up quite a bit of torque. For how I use the truck this is just fine, and I won't be looking for that lost hp.
My timing is pretty tame, peak about 20°. I am sure that I could get more power from timing, but I do plenty of towing with the truck and want to be on the safe side.
Smoothing 0, Uncorrected
Smoothing 2, Corrected
full pull
Sales&Support Valair Inc
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,683
I dont know who your talking to, but if if was toward me....
I have a sled pulling truck< i could care less if I put up a cool dyno number.. that doesnt mean jack.
full pull
Sales&Support Valair Inc
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,683
This whole thread you keep going on about how bad ass your truck is, but I have yet to see you do any of the following.
Rev past 4000RPM like you say you can.
Make power past 3850RPM like you say you can.
Put down a huge dyno number with a single 2.6 trubo.
Hook to a sled and do worth a crap.
So untill you can prove you can do any of this stuff..
You STFU
Just for the record
A dyno is a tuning tool. The numbers mean nothing unless you put them to use.
Rev past 4000RPM like you say you can.
Make power past 3850RPM like you say you can.
Put down a huge dyno number with a single 2.6 trubo.
Hook to a sled and do worth a crap.
So untill you can prove you can do any of this stuff..
You STFU
Just for the record
A dyno is a tuning tool. The numbers mean nothing unless you put them to use.
Last edited:
JasonCzerak
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 14,827
I had an unexpected chance to dyno today. Last time I dyno'd was in 08 with the JR on SW3, stock turbo, and stock cam.
The new graph is much smoother! This is smoothing on zero. The below numbers are uncorrected, the corrected numbers are 414/850. I am impressed how flat the torque curve is, and how consistent the numbers were on runs 2 and 3. Run #1 was PoD on 70, I was curious how it effected WOT power, and it's pretty obvious. Run #2 was PoD on 85, which is were I run normally and my gauges told me it was the same power as PoD99, which I was able to verify. The throttle and power are smoother on PoD85 when towing, and the smoke is also down a little (not that it really smokes anyhow).
My previous dyno was 387/712 (437/808), so I am down a few hp but up quite a bit of torque. For how I use the truck this is just fine, and I won't be looking for that lost hp.
My timing is pretty tame, peak about 20°. I am sure that I could get more power from timing, but I do plenty of towing with the truck and want to be on the safe side.
Smoothing 0, Uncorrected
Smoothing 2, Corrected
I've left pod on 99 for the most part. your 85 vs 99 is interesting. Thanks, ill give a little less pod a try!
mikmaze
New member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 4,292
I though this was supposed to be the cats ass of tuners for high hp applications, what the heck does a 414 hp truck have to do with a tuners ability to tune for serious power? I've watched 4bt's put out 100 hp more than that running on wmo blend for petes sake!