crazy that 5tho is noticable. Zach what are the negitives to running tighter lash? (besides the obvious danger from burning a valve)
There is no danger of burning a valve.
here is how the lash for the 12v and 24v changes the two exhaust profiles factoring for different rocker ratios. These are total open time numbers at the valve(.001")
208@.050" exhaust profile 12v @.020" 250 degrees
12v @.015" 252 degrees
24v @.020" 246 degrees
24v @.015" 256 degrees
210@.050" exhaust profile 12v @.020" 288 degrees
12v @.015" 305 degrees
24v @.020" 274 degrees
24v @.015" 293 degrees
to understand at what cam lift the valve lash is taken up you divide the lash by the rocker ratio, so 12v would be .020"/ 1.69 = .01183" or at .01183" lift multiplied by the rocker ratio the .020" would have been taken up.
For the 24v it is 1.37-1.38 intake or 1.375 for an average and 1.34 ehxaust ratio.
As you can see, the difference in lash can do quite a bit to add duration at the lower lifts. Now you are asking how this translates to better spool, the added open time by itself is no better at making power, but it opens the exhaust a little sooner, which spools the turbo a little sooner. Based on the information we have so far in Dyno testing, the 178-208 likes small turbos that spool with very little turbine energy. We got a huge bump in the lower rpm but in the higher rpm range(over 2500) we did not see that gain carry out.
The 178-208-106.5 @.020" exhaust lash will do best cruising at 2000rpm or less. I would like all of you to test it again @ .015" and do a test at 1900rpm and one at 2100 or whatever the test speed was previously.
Zach